MANUFACTURING OF THE SIBERIAN FEDERAL DISTRICT REGIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF ECONOMIC SAFETY

Introduction. The article is devoted to the study of the regional manufacturing industry of the Siberian Federal District from the standpoint of economic security. The purpose of the article is to analyze the manufacturing industries on the basis of the proposed indicators group and in the context of ensuring economic security of the Siberian federal district.

Materials and methods. The scientific methods of logic, comparison, as well as the method of the statistical materials’ analysis are used in the research. The analysis of the manufacturing industry was carried out in two groups of indicators:

1)            indicators determining the socio-economic importance of the manufacturing industry for the region;

2)            indicators of the export potential of the regional manufacturing industries, contributing to the development of the region.

Results. The main results of the study are in identifying the regions of the Siberian Federal District, in which the manufacturing industry is the most important component in supporting the development of the region and maintaining its economic security. Moreover, special attention is paid to the contribution of manufacturing industries to the socio-economic stability of the Omsk region.

The paper touches upon the theoretical and methodological provisions related to the study of the role of manufacturing industry in the development of the country and its regions and in improvement of methods for assessing regional economic security. The author proposes the group of indicators that allow more accurately reveal the impact of manufacturing industry on the socio-economic condition of the region.

Discussion and conclusion. The conducted research allows supplementing the existing scientific directions with the approach, which clarifies the assessment of the manufacturing industry with an analysis of its export potential indicators, in order to expand the comprehensive understanding of the most problematic points of regional development from economic security point of view.

1. Abalkin L.I. Logika ehkonomicheskogo rosta [Logic of economic growth]. Moscow, Insti-tut ehkonomiki RAN, 2002. 228 p. (in Russian)

2. Bodrunov S. Novoe industrial’noe obsh-chestvo vtorogo pokoleniya: chelovek, proiz-vodstvo, razvitie [New industrial society of the second generation: man, production, development]. Obshchestvo i ehkonomika, 2016, no 9, pp. 5-21. (in Russian)

3. Klejner G.B. Sistemnaya transformaci-ya promyshlennosti kak «tverdogo yadra» otechestvennoj ehkonomiki [Systemic transformation of the industry as a “solid core” of domestic economy]. Trudy Vol’nogo ehkonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii, 2017, T. 207, pp. 210-223. (in Russian)

4. Afonichkina E.A., Afonichkina N.A. Rol’ segmenta obrabatyvayushchej promyshlennosti v razvitii mirovoj ehkonomiki [Role of the manufacturing segment in the development of the world economy] Vestnik Volzhskogo universite-ta im. V.N.Tatishcheva. 2012. № 3. pp. 25-37. (in Russian)

5. Miller A. Methodological approach to assessment of organizational resources of the productive activity. Serbian Journal of Management, no 12 (1) 2017, Pp. 93 - 106. DOI: 10.5937/sjm12-11357.

6. Miller A.E., Miller N.V, Davidenko L.M. Formation of Integrated Industrial Companies under Current Conditions // Asian Social Science, Vol. 11, No. 19, 2015. Pp. 70-81. DOI: 10.5539/ass.v11n19p70/

7. Transforming Economies. Making industrial policy work for growth, jobs and development / J.M. Salazar - Xirinachs etc., International Labour Organization, Geneva, 2014. 411 p.

8. Kregel J. Economic development and financial instability. Anthem Press, 2014. 376 p.

9. Mazzucato M. et al. Which industrial policy does Europe need / Intereconomics. 2015. Vol. 50. № 3. pp.120-155. DOI: 10.1007/s10272-015-0535-1

10. Romano L. Understanding structural divergence in European manufacturing/ Intereconomics. 2016. Vol. 51. № 5. pp.288-294. DOI: 10.1007/s10272-016-0620-0

11. Reinert Erik S. How rich countries got rich and why poor countries stay poor. Moscow, HSE publ., 2017. 384 p.

12. Gordeev O.I., Gordeev S.O. Razvitie pro-myshlennosti regiona v usloviyah v usloviyah perekhoda k pod”emu ehkonomiki: strategiya, politika i sredstva obespecheniya [Development of industry in the region in conditions of economic recovery: strategy, policy and means of support]. St. Petersburg, NKP «ROST», 2007. 365 p. (in Russian)

13. Faktory ustojchivogo razvitiya region-ov Rossii: monografiya/ pod obshch. red. S.S.CHernova. Kniga 7. [Factors of sustainable development of Russian regions: monograph]. Novosibirsk: Izd-vo «SIBPRINT», 2010. 177 p. (in Russian)

14. Faktory ustojchivogo razvitiya regionov Rossii: monografiya/ pod obshch. red. S.S.CHernova. Kniga 9. [Factors of sustainable development of the Russian regions: monograph]. Novosibirsk: Izd-vo «SIBPRINT», 2010. 275 p. (in Russian)

15. Kovaleva E.N., Oganova A.A. Nesyr’evoj neehnergeticheskij ehksport Rossii makro- i mezourovnya: osnovnye tendencii razvitiya i napravleniya podderzhki [Non-raw and non-energy exports of Russia to macro- and meso-lev-el: main development trends and directions of support]. Nauchnyj zhurnal NIU ITMO. Seriya EHkonomika i ehkologicheskij menedzhment, 2018, no 2, pp. 36-45. (in Russian)

16. YAkushev N.O. Vysokotekhnologichnyj ehksport Rossii i ego territorial’naya specifika [High-tech exports of Russia and its territorial specification]. Problemy razvitiya territorii, 2017, no 3, pp. 62-77. (in Russian)

17. Bazhanov V.A. Obrabatyvayushchie proizvodstva Sibiri: sostoyanie, problemy, prog-nozy [Manufacturing industries in Siberia: state, problems, forecasts]. Vestnik NGU. Seriya: Social’no-ehkonomicheskie nauki, 2010, Tom 10, Vyp. 3, pp. 18-33.

18. Kuznetsov S.V., Rastova Yu.I., Sushche-va N.V. The role of public companies in creating a platform for economic growth in Saint Petersburg // Baltis Region. 2018. Vol. 10, № 1. R. 3755. DOI: 10.5922/2079-8555-2018-1-3.

19. Teoriya i praktika ocenki ehkonomich-eskoj bezopasnosti (na primere regionov Si-birskogo federal’nogo okruga). [Theory and practice of assessing economic security (on the example of the regions of the Siberian federal district)]. Novosibirsk: izd-vo IEHOPP SO RAN, 2017. 146 p. (in Russian)

20. Promyshlennyj kompleks Omskoj oblasti: voprosy global’noj integracii [Industrial complex of the Omsk region: issues of global integration]. Novosibirsk: IEHOPP SO RAN, 2015. 404 p. (in Russian)

21. Aliev A.B. Issledovanie problemy ehko-nomicheskoj bezopasnosti promyshlennosti i nauchno-tekhnicheskoj sfery [Research of the economic safety problem in scientific and technical sphere]. Aktual’nye voprosy ehkonomich-eskih nauk, 2012, no 25, p. 177-187. (in Russian)

22. Novikova I.V., Krasnikov N.I. Metodika vydeleniya indikatorov ehkonomicheskoj bezopasnosti regiona [Technique of highlighting the indicators of economic security in the region]. Terra Economicus, 2009, T. 7, no 2-3. pp. 208210. (in Russian)

23. Korableva A.A. Issledovanie metod-ologicheskih aspektov ehkonomicheskoj bezopasnosti regiona [Research of methodological aspects of economic security in the region]. Vestnik SibADI, 2013, no 6, pp. 118-125. (in Russian)

24. Kalinina N.M. Ekonomicheskaya bezo-pasnost’ regiona: sushchnost’, ugrozy i mery obespecheniya [Economic security of the region: the essence, threats and measures to ensure]. Sibirskij torgovo-ehkonomicheskij zhurnal, 2010, no 10, pp. 17-23. (in Russian)

25. Edelev A.L. Strategicheskaya stabil’nost’ i ehkonomicheskaya bezopasnost’ sub”ektov Rossijskoj Federacii: monografiya [Strategic stability and economic security of the Russian Federation regions]. Moscow, Akad. ehkonomicheskoj bezopasnosti MVD Rossii, 2007. 116 p. (in Russian)