THE STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT OF THE REGION: THE PECULIARITIES OF THE INNOVATIVE MODELS’ FORMATION

Background. The author’s vision of the strategy selection process, according to which external and internal development conditions of the region provide  the possibility to obtain a sustainable competitive advantage in the adequate  territorial innovation models’ formation is presented in the article.

Methods. The methodology as a synthesis of the systemic, evolutionary and spatio-temporal approaches is developed. The systematic approach allows to  explore the organizational and institutional region structure, which elements  are interrelated and complemented to each other. The evolutionary approach for understanding and assessing the internal system dynamics, the relationship between actors and basic units in evolutionairy internal and  external environment is used. The space-time approach involves the usage of multidimensional spatial-temporal coordinates.

Conclusions. The main types of the innovative territorial models are highlighted. The features of the essential elements’ formation and the  innovative infrastructure’s relations are revealed. The holistic vision of the  territorial innovation models’ formation problem is proposed. The process of a center-peripheral mechanisms forming with the different regional  innovation potential is considered. Also the features of their place and role  formation in the process of generating and using knowledge and technology  are identified. The article show that the innovation strategy development is  an effective way of the competitive advantages’ development in the territories, the need for storage and the constant search for new knowledge,  as well as the successful adaptation to the changing business environment are also proved in the research. The necessity to develop the  innovative strategies based on the of territorial innovation models’ individualization and on the regional context is substantiated in the article.

Practical importance. The definiteness to the states of the research could be used as a theoretical model which defines the interrelations between  factors and variables. It is possible to develop specific hypotheses about the success of the innovation strategy basing on this model.

1. Birjukov V.V., Romanenko E.V. Mehanizmy formirovanija temporal’nyh konkurentnyh preimushhestv jekonomiki i razvitie malogo predprinimatel’stva [Mechanisms of formation of temporal competitive advantages of economy and small business development], Vestnik OMGU, Serija Jekonomika, 2011. no 4. pp. 5 -12.

2. Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics. Macmillan, London.

3. Cruz, S., & Teixeira, A. (2011). The Evolution of this. Cluster Literature: Shedding Light on the Regional StudiesVRegional Science Debate. Regional Studies. V. 44, 9.

4. Freeman, C. (1987) Technology Policy and Economy Performance. London: Pinter Publishers.

5. Klineand, S.J., & Rosenberg, N. (1986). An Overview of Innovation // The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Crowth / edited by R. Landau, N. Rosenberg. Washington: National Academy Press.

6. Lundvall, B. (1992). National Innovation Systems: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter.

7. Chesbrought, H.W. (2003). The Era of open Innovation MIT Sloan Management Review. V. 44, 3.

8. Chessell, M. (2008). Innovation Ecosystems – an IBM Academy of Technology study. IBM, May.

9. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and «Mode 2» to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations Research Policy, V. 29.

10. Moulaert, F., & Sekia, F. (2003). Territorial innovation models: a critical survey Regional Studies V. 37.

11. Asheim, В.Т. (2002). Regional Innovation Systems: The Integration of Local «Sticky» and Global «Ubiquitous» Knowledge. Journal of Technology Transfer. 27.

12. Cooke, P. (2001). Regional Innovation Systems, Clusters, and the Knowledge Economy. Industrial and Corporate Change. 10 (4), 945-974.

13. Crevoisier, O. (2014). Beyond/Territorial Innovation Models: The Pertinence of the Territorial Approach. Regional Studies. V. 48, 3.

14. Birjukov V.V., Birjukova V.V. Razvitie predprinimatel’stva i hozjajstvennye izmenenija v rossijskoj promyshlennosti [The development of entrepreneurship and economic changes in Russian industry: monograph], monografija, Omsk, SibADI, 2010. 260 p.

15. Moodysson, J., & Zukauskaite, E. (2014). Institutional Conditions and Innovation Systems: On the Impact of Regional Policy on Firms in Different Sectors. Regional Studies. V. 48. 1.

16. Edquist, Ch., & McKelvey, M. (2002). Systems of Innovation: Growth Competitiveness and Employment. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.

17. Etzkowitz, H., & Dzisah, J. (2008). Unity and Diversity in High-tech Growth and Renewal: Learning from Boston and Silicon VaIley. European Planning Studies, V. 16. 8. September.

18. Biryukov, V.V., Romanenko, E.V., Khairova, S.M., Khairov, B.G. (2015). Cyclic- temporal competitive advantages of the national economy and entrepreneurship development. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, V.6, 4, 64-71.

19. Cook, I., & Joseph, R (2001). Rethinking Silicon Valley: New Perspectives on Regional Developmenty. Proraetheus: Critical Studies in Innovation V. 19, 4.

20. Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., Lundvall, В. (2002). Why All this Fuss about Codified and Tacit Knowledge? Industrial and Corporate Change, V. 11.

21. Karlsson, Ch., Nellander, Ch., Paulsson, T. (2004). A Spatial ICT Clusters in Sweden – An Empirical Method to Identify Necessary conditions for existence. – Entrepreneurship and Dynamics in a Knowledge Economy. London, New York: Routledge.

22. Carlsson, B. (2003). Innovation Systems: A Survey of the Literature from a Schumpeterian Perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

23. OECD Science (2009). Technology and Industry Scoreboard.

24. Ridley, M. (2010). Rational Optimist: How Prosperity Evolves. Harper.

25. Storper, M., & Scott, A. (1995). The Wealth of Regions: Market Forces and Policy Imperatives in Local and Global Context. Futures. V. 27.

26. Asheim, В.T., & Cooke, P. (1998). Localised Innovation Networks in a Global Economy: A Comparative Analysis of Endogenous and Exogenous Regional Development Approaches. Comparative Social Research. 17.

27. Tornquist, К.M., & Kallsen, L.A. (1994). Out of the ivory tower: characteristics of institutions meeting the research need of industry. Journal of Higher Education. V. 65, 5.

28. Birjukov V.V. Vremja kak faktor jekonomicheskogo razvitija v rynochnyh uslovijah [Time as a factor of economic development in market conditions: monograph], monografija, S-Pb, Izd-vo SPbGUJeF, 2000.

29. Aydalot, P. (1984). Questions for regional econоmy. Economy en Socialogy Geografie V. 75, 1.

30. Aula, P., & Harmaakorpi, V. (2008). An Innovative Milieu – A View on Regional Reputation Building: Case Study of the Lahti Urban Region. Regional Studies, V. 42, 4.

31. Longhi, C. (1999) Networks, Collective Learning and Technology Development in Innovative High Technology Regions: The Case of Sophia-Antipolis. Regional Studies. V. 33, 4, 333-342.

32. Su, X. (2014). Multi-Scalar Regionalization, Network Connections and the Development of Yunnan Province, China Regional Studies. V. 48, 1.

33. Biryukov, V.V., Romanenko, E.V. (2016). The formation of territorial innovation models. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. V. 9(12). March.