ADVANTAGES AND SHORTCOMINGS OF PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP OF DEVELOPMENT OF TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE
https://doi.org/10.26518/2071-7296-2017-3(55)-175-181
Abstract
In this article questions of application of public-private partnership in the European Union countries are considered, the share of projects of public-private partnership on spheres of economy for the developed and developing states is investigated. Distribution of projects of public-private partnership on spheres of economy of the Russian Federation is considered, assessment of the current situation and the prospects of development of this direction in our country is made. Key advantages and shortcomings of public-private partnership taking into account specifics of economy of Russia come to light, the analysis of need of development of this form of cooperation in the field of large-scale transport projects is made, including at realization of Transport strategy of Russia till 2030. At the end of article recommendations about improvement of interaction of the authorities and private business in the field of public-private partnership are provided.
About the Authors
R. S. Simak
Omsk state transport university
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Simak Roman Sergeyevich– candidate of economic sciences, the associate professor
(644046, Omsk, Marx Ave., 35)
D. I. Vasiliev
Omsk state transport university
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vasilyev Dmitry Igorevich– teacher
(644046, Omsk, Marx Ave., 35)
References
1. Kuznetsov I. V. Zarubezhnyy opyt gosudarstvennochastnogo partnerstva (SShA, Evropa, Kanada) [Foreign experience of public-private partnership (USA, Europe, Canada)]. World Economy and International Economic Relations, No. 8, 2012. – pp.196 - 204.
2. Mankova A.O. Mezhdunarodnyy opyt realizatsii proektov gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnerstva [International experience in implementing public-private partnership projects]. Problems of Economics and Management No. 10 (62), 2016. - pp.10 – 15.
3. Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation. Issledovanie «Razvitie gosudarstvennochastnogo partnerstva v Rossii v 2015–2016 godakh. Reyting regionov po urovnyu razvitiya GChP» [Research “Development of publicprivate partnership in Russia in 2015-2016. Rating of regions by the level of PPP development “Association” PPP Development Center”]. Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation. - Moscow: Association “Center for PPP Development”, 2016. - 36 p.
4. Transportnaya sfera lidiruet v GChP po ob”emu investitsiy [Transport sphere is leading in PPP in terms of investment volume:Analytical review]. - Moscow, 2015.
5. Varnavsky V.G. Gosudarstvenno-chastnoe partnerstvo: nekotorye voprosy metodologii: Analiticheskiy obzor [Public-private partnership: some issues of methodology: Analytical review]. - Moscow, 2012.
6. Infrastruktura Rossii: investitsii: Analiticheskiy obzor [Infrastructure of Russia: investment: Analytical review]. - Moscow, 2013.
7. Investitsii KNR v razvitie transportnoy infrastruktury: Analiticheskiy obzor [Investment of China in the development of transport infrastructure: Analytical review]. – Moscow, 2013.
8. Infrastruktura Rossii: Analiticheskiy obzor. [Infrastructure of Russia: Analytical review]. GazPromBank, 2014. - 60 p.
9. Doklad za 2015 god o realizatsii transportnoy strategii Rossiyskoy Federatsii na period do 2030 goda [The report for 2015 on the implementation of the transport strategy of the Russian Federation for the period until 2030]. - Moscow, 2015.
10. Praktika primeneniya kontsessionnykh soglasheniy dlya razvitiya regional’noy infrastruktury v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [The practice of applying concession agreements for the development of regional infrastructure in the Russian Federation]. - Moscow: Center for the Development of Public-Private Partnerships, 2016. – 63 p.
Review
For citations:
Simak R.S., Vasiliev D.I. ADVANTAGES AND SHORTCOMINGS OF PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP OF DEVELOPMENT OF TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE. The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal. 2017;(3(55)):175-181. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26518/2071-7296-2017-3(55)-175-181
Views:
956
Email this article 