BIM-integrated framework in support of operation and maintenance management of educational buildings: a case study from developing countries
https://doi.org/10.26518/2071-7296-2026-23-4-680-693
EDN: YUUOIK
Abstract
Introduction. For decades, operation and maintenance has been the longest, most costly, and most resource-intensive phase of a project, especially in developing countries where traditional practices are still in place, which include a lack of modern resource management technologies and a reliance on antiquated operating systems that use a lot of energy. Educational projects like schools and universities require effective operation and maintenance processes due to their continuous public usage and importance for community development. However, traditional facility management in developing countries like Iraq is characterized by fragmented information flows, insufficient preventative maintenance, and poor asset data management. Through the use of organized data, visualization, and links to computerized maintenance management systems (CMMS), Building Information Modeling (BIM) has shown potential for improving operation and maintenance practices.
Materials and Methods. This paper proposes a Building Information Modeling-Facility Management )BIM-FM( workflow framework within the context of educational infrastructure in developing countries. Adopting a case study approach, the study analyzes the existing FM process in a typical school in Kut city, central Iraq, highlights obstacles, and develops a BIM-FM workflow that integrates Construction Operations Building information exchange (COBie), digital work orders, and preventive maintenance planning.
The findings demonstrate that the BIM-enabled FM framework improves data availability and stakeholder collaboration, while also revealing limitations such as high implementation costs, lack of skilled labor, and insufficient digital infrastructure. The study proposes a novel methodology that can be applied to public educational facilities in resource-constrained environments, laying the groundwork for sustainable school management practices.
Conclusion. The study argues that a BIM-FM workflow during the operational phase of educational buildings in developing countries can enhance operational efficiency and asset dependability; nevertheless, its implementation is hindered by challenges including a shortage of qualified staff, a lack of BIM standards and high early expenses for operations and maintenance. Notwithstanding these limitations, the framework provides a structured approach for incorporating BIM into FM to increase the sustainability of educational infrastructure. Future research should expand the scope to include several schools and analyze the long-term cost-benefit implications.
About the Authors
Al-jaberi Karrar Abbas OleiwiRussian Federation
Al-jaberi Karrar Abbas Oleiwi - PhD student at the Faculty of Civil Engineering
6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., Moscow 117198
Elsheikh Asser Mohamed
Russian Federation
Elsheikh Asser Mohamed - Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Associate professor, Department of Construction Technology and Structural Materials, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN); Department of Structural Engineering, Mansoura University
6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., Moscow 117198
El Gomhouria St., Mansoura, Egypt,35516
Malik Ghali Salman
Russian Federation
Malik Ghali Salman - PhD student at the Faculty of Civil Engineering
6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., Moscow 117198
References
1. AlMazrouei M., Ahmed R., Muckattu J. Management of Facilities Services Across ADNOC Group Companies. Society of Petroleum Engineers ADIPEC. 2023. https://doi.org/10.2118/216486-ms
2. Challender J., Challender R. Building and Facilities Maintenance Management. CRC Press, 2024. [2] https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003358800
3. Alotaibi F.F. Analyzing the Relationship Between Sustainability and Maintenance in the Facilities Sector // OMAINTEC Scientific Journal. 2023. Vol. 23, No. 68.
4. Teicholz, Paul, ed. BIM for facility managers. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.f
5. Duong H.D., Lin J.J. Reality model-based facility management framework for existing building. Frontiers in Built Environment. 2022; 8: 815672.
6. Bortolini, R., Forcada N., Macarulla. “BIM for the integration of Building Maintenance Management: A case study of a university campus.” eWork and eBusiness in Architecture, Engineering and Construction: ECPPM 2016. CRC Press, 2017. 427-434.f
7. Congiu E., Quaquero E., Gola G., Pani F.P. Building information modeling and geographic information system: integrated framework in support of facility management (FM). Buildings. 2024; 14(3): 610.
8. Su Y.C., Lee Y.C., Lin Y.C. Enhancing maintenance management using building information modeling in facilities management. 28th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, ISARC 2011. 2011.
9. Ariffin E.Y., Mustafa N.E., Sapri M. Perspective towards the Perceived Benefits and Challenges on Building Information Modelling-Facility Management (BIM-FM) Integration at an Early Stage of BIM Projects. International Journal of Real Estate Studies
10. Naji K.K., Gunduz M., Al-Qahtani A. Unveiling Digital Transformation: Analyzing Building Facility Management’s Preparedness for Transformation Using Structural Equation Modeling. Buildings. 2024; 14(9):2794.
11. Opoku A., Lee J.Y. The future of facilities management: managing facilities for sustainable development. Sustainability. 2022; 14(3): 1705.
12. Azhar S. Building information modeling (BIM): Trends, benefits, risks, and challenges for the AEC industry. Leadership and management in engineering
13. Waqar, A., Othman, I., Hayat, S., Radu, D., Khan, M. B., Galatanu, T. F., ... & Benjeddou, O. (2023). Building information modeling—empowering construction projects with end-to-end life cycle management. Buildings, 13(8), 2041.f
14. E. Teicholz. Facility design and management handbook. McGraw-Hill Education. 2001. 752 P.
15. Spinner A., Degani A. Online as-Built Building Information Model Update for Robotic Monitoring in Construction Sites. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems. 2024; 110(2): 50.
16. Chatsuwan M., Kim S., Jha N.K., Mahdjoubi L., Gidado K. BIM–FM interoperability through open standards: a critical literature review. Architecture. 2025; 5(3): 74.
17. Altwassi E.J., Aysu E., Ercoskun K., Abu Raed A. From design to management: exploring BIM’s role across project lifecycles, dimensions, data, and uses, with emphasis on facility management. Buildings. 2024; 14(3): 611. doi.org
18. Pan X., Zhang Y., Yang Y., Li Y., Zhao L. BIM adoption in sustainability, energy modelling and implementing using ISO 19650: A review. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. 2024; 15(1): 102252.
19. Enoma A. The role of facilities management at the design stage. 21st Annual ARCOM Conference. London: SOAS, University of London, 2005; 1.
20. Gordo-Gregorio P., Alavi H., Forcada N. Decoding BIM challenges in facility management areas: a stakeholders’ perspective. Buildings. 2025; 15(5): 811.
Review
For citations:
Oleiwi A., Mohamed E., Salman M. BIM-integrated framework in support of operation and maintenance management of educational buildings: a case study from developing countries. The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal. 2026;23(4):680-693. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26518/2071-7296-2026-23-4-680-693. EDN: YUUOIK
JATS XML



































