Preview

User

Not a user? Register with this site Forgot your password?

The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal

Advanced search

Editorial Policies

Aim and Scope

The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal is a peer-reviewed academic journal intended to provide high quality information on significant research findings and innovative developments.

The main goal of the journal is to focus on new achievements of Russian and foreign researchers in the field of automobile transport, mechanical and civil engineering, building materials. The journal is to promote advanced knowledge and up-to-date information as well as to provide communication environment to exchange views on novel approaches in these spheres. The key objective of the journal is emphasizing practical aspects of new technologies and introduction scientific advances into practice.

Target audience

Among our authors and readers are experienced and highly ranked scholars who show high competence and make substantial contribution to their field of knowledge by doing advanced research. We also encourage publication of manuscripts written by post-graduate students and young researchers. We offer a platform for students and scholars to present their developments and research findings.

Among the primary goals are:

  • communicating scientific findings and professional knowledge among researchers and experts in the fields related to the scope of the journal;
  • enhancing the quality of published papers;
  • promoting most advanced and promising research within the scope of the journal;
  • developing relations between research communities;
  • stimulating consistent and increasing interest of scientific community in the journal.

Materials submitted for publication are:

  • articles which report original research and include description of research methods, results, discussion of the results obtained and conclusions;
  • reviews which focus on the latest scientific achievements in the field of automobile transport, mechanical and civil engineering, building materials.

The peer review is carried out by reviewers who are selected from the pool of subject matter experts from different academic institutions of Russia and other countries. We provide geographical diversity in authorship by attracting the most authoritative scientists from different countries who specialize in the fields within the scope of our Journal.

 

Section Policies

TRANSPORT, MINING AND BUILDING MACHINERY ENGINEERING
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
TRANSPORT
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURE
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
INFORMATICS, COMPUTER ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
ECONOMIC SCIENCES
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
TRANSPORT. TRANSPORT AND TECHNOLOGICAL MACHINES
Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed
BUILDING. BUILDING MATERIALS AND PRODUCTS
Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed
MATH MODELING. SYSTEM AUTOMATION DESIGN
Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed
ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT
Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed
UNIVERSITY AND POST-UNIVERSITY EDUCATION
Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed
TRANSPORTATION. TRANSPORT AND TECHNOLOGICAL MACHINES
Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed
CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURE
Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed
INFORMATICS, COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY AND CONTROL
Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed
ERRATUM
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Publication Frequency

6 issues per year

 

Open Access Policy

This is an open access journal. We are committed to ensuring that free open access to scholarly publications contributes significantly to the increase in the global knowledge exchange. 

Our open access policy complies with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) – it means free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself.

For more information please read BOAI statement (https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/).

 

Archiving

  • Russian State Library (RSL)
  • National Electronic-Information Consortium (NEICON)

 

Peer-Review

GUIDELINES FOR REVIEWERS

Review Policy adopted by the chief editor: 26.01.2024.

The editorial board of the journal The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal follows COPE recommendations when working with manuscripts, reviewers, and organizing the review process.

Type of review

All manuscripts submitted to the editorial board of the journal The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal undergo mandatory double-blind peer review. This means that neither the author nor the reviewer knows each other's names and affiliations, and all correspondence is conducted through the editor of the journal The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal. Each manuscript is sent to one or, if necessary two experts.

Review timeline

The review process in the journal The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal takes on average from 2 to 6 months. Within this period, the editorial board includes time for the initial consideration of the manuscript, selection of reviewers, time for preparing the review, time for the author to revise the article and re-review, and involvement of additional experts.

Review Process

The decision to select a reviewer for the journal The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal is made by the editor.

A minimum of two reviewers are assigned to each manuscript. If these two reviewers disagree on the manuscript, the editorial staff may consult a third reviewer.

The Editor of the journal The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal can give the author one of the following decisions on the manuscript:

Acceptance for publication

In this case, the manuscript will proceed to the editing stage and will be published in a future issue of The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal. The author will be informed of the publication date.

Acceptance for publication after revision according to the reviewers’ comments

In this case, the author will be advised to revise the manuscript according to the reviewers’ comments. If the author makes changes according to the reviewers’ comments or presents a reasoned refusal to change the manuscript, the manuscript will be accepted for publication.

Acceptance for publication after revision according to the reviewers’ comments and another round of peer review

In this case, the author will be recommended to revise the manuscript according to the reviewers’ comments. The manuscript will then be sent for a second round of peer review. The author will be informed of the final decision on the manuscript within 30 days.

Rejection

In this case, the manuscript will be rejected, and the author will be informed of the reasons for rejection. Generally, a rejection does not bar authors from submitting other manuscripts to The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal. However, if the rejection is due to serious misconduct, the editor-in-chief may choose to blacklist the authors. As a result, the editorial staff will not consider any further submissions by them.

At The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal, the peer-review process involves three rounds of review. Therefore, if recommended to revise the manuscript according to the reviewers’ comments, the author has two attempts to revise the manuscript or to present a reasoned refusal to change it. If a reviewer is not satisfied after the third round of review, the author will be suggested to consider submitting the manuscript to another journal or resubmitting a revised version in 6 months.

The editorial staff should be informed if the author is unwilling or unable to revise the manuscript.

If the author has a conflicting interest with a potential reviewer, the author should disclose this to the editor. If necessary, the journal’s editorial staff will appoint another peer reviewer.

A conflict of interest between an author and a reviewer may arise during peer review. In such case, the editor has the right to select another reviewer for the manuscript and to appeal to the editor-in-chief for reconciliation.

The editor-in-chief, deputy editors-in-chief, the executive secretary, and Editorial Board members may publish their articles in The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal, provided that they do not abuse their authority. The manuscripts submitted by the authors affiliated with the journal will be assigned for double-blind peer review exclusively to external reviewers. Disagreements and conflicts will be resolved exclusively by external experts. If there are conflicting views regarding a manuscript submitted by the editor-in-chief, the final decision on its publication will be made by the Editorial Board.

The articles submitted by the editor-in-chief, deputy editors-in-chief, and Editorial Board members should indicate the authors’ affiliation with The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal in the Disclosure section.

There are no exceptions to peer review based on the status of the author.

Copies of reviews are kept on file in the editorial office for at least 5 years.

Pool of reviewers

All the submitted manuscripts are reviewed by external reviewers experienced in the relevant field who have published works on the topic of the manuscript under review within the last 3 years.

If the topic of the manuscript is very narrow and/or its author declares a potential conflict of interest with external reviewers, the editors may involve Editorial Board members in the peer-review process.

Reviewer selection principles and measures taken by the editorial staff to ensure high-quality review

The editorial board of the journal The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal  carries out regular work to attract recognized experts in the field of road transport, mechanical engineering, industrial and civil engineering and construction materials to work on the journal, as well as timely rotation of reviewers.

The reviewers are invited to work for The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal  on the recommendation of the editor-in-chief, deputy editors-in-chief, Editorial Board members, and scientific editors.

The scientific editors routinely monitor the Scopus, Web of Science, and RISC databases for publications related to the subject area of the journal and send collaboration invitations to the authors of relevant publications.

The first review prepared by a reviewer is evaluated using the following Review Quality Instrument:

  1. Did the reviewer discuss the importance of the research question?
  2. Did the reviewer discuss the originality of the manuscript?
  3. Did the reviewer clearly identify the strengths and weaknesses of the research (study design, data collection, and data analysis)?
  4. Did the reviewer make specific and useful comments on the writing, organisation, tables, and figures in the manuscript?
  5. Were the comments of the reviewer constructive?
  6. Did the reviewer supply appropriate evidence using examples from the article to substantiate their comments?
  7. Did the reviewer comment on the author’s interpretation of the results?
  8. How would you rate the overall review quality?

The score range for each question is 1 to 5, where 1 is the lowest score and 5 is the highest score.

If the editors of the journal are not happy with a review, they stop working with the reviewer.

The editors are entitled to use the above instrument to evaluate the quality of an unrestricted number of reviews by any reviewer working for The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal.

Reviewer engagement

At The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal, the editors consider peer review one of the most important processes for the journal; they value the expertise and time of the reviewers involved.

The names of reviewers and their places of work are published on the The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal website in open access without indicating which articles they reviewed.

Confidentiality

At The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal, the editors keep the reviewers’ and the authors’ personal data confidential.

The manuscripts submitted to the journal are treated as confidential documents, and the editorial staff expect that the reviewers will not share or discuss them with third parties, unless authorised by the editorial staff. Only with the consent of their editor may the reviewers involve third parties in the peer-review process.

Reviewer Responsibilities

By agreeing to review a manuscript for The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal, the expert commits to following the journal’s policies, ethical requirements, and professional standards for evaluating manuscripts and preparing reviews.

The reviewer should strive to ensure the high quality of the materials published in The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal, just like the editors of the journal. Therefore, the reviewer should agree to review only if they have sufficient expertise in the subject and enough time to carry out a thorough and comprehensive review.

The reviewer is obliged to inform the scientific editor of having a conflicting interest (personal, financial, intellectual, professional, political, or religious). When in doubt, the reviewer should discuss the potential conflict of interest with the scientific editor.

The reviewer may refuse to work on the manuscript at any stage of the peer-review process. In this case, the reviewer should inform the editorial staff.

The reviewer should refrain from reviewing if:

  • They are in a superior–subordinate position or hold joint grants with the author;
  • They do not intend to review the manuscript, but want to gain sight of it;
  • They are going to publish an article on a similar topic; or
  • They are reviewing a manuscript on a similar topic.

The reviewer should inform the editor of their consent to review the manuscript, and they should complete the review within the time limits specified by the editor. When unable to review, they should recommend an alternative reviewer to the editor.

The reviewer cannot use their status for personal purposes or impose references to their own publications on the authors.

All the materials that the reviewer receives from the editor are strictly confidential. The reviewer should not share these materials with third parties or involve other specialists in the review of a manuscript, except if authorised by the editorial staff.

For the reviewer's convenience, the editorial office of the journal The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal offers to use the form for quick review - it reflects the questions, answers to which are necessary for the editor to make a decision about the article.

The editorial board of the journal asks the reviewer to pay more attention to the "Comments" section to help authors improve current and future papers.

Review content and structure

This section follows the recommendations of the National Electronic Information Consortium (NEICON). The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal is allowed to use these methodological recommendations in its review policy.

10 criteria for manuscript evaluation:

– originality;

– logical rigour;

– statistical rigour;

– clarity and conciseness of writing style;

– theoretical significance;

– reliability of the results;

– pertinence to current research in the discipline;

– reproducibility of the results;

– coverage of significant existing literature;

– applicability of the results.

In addition to the Standard Review Form, the editors of the journal recommend using the following review structure.

Comments for editors. The Conflict of Interest section should describe actual or potential conflicts of interest related to the content of the manuscript or its authors, which may lead to a biased conclusion. The Confidential Comments section is intended for comments that will not be sent to the author. It should include the reviewer’s conclusion on the manuscript, assumptions, concerns about potential ethical issues, recommendations, and comments (e.g., the reviewer may advise the editor to request additional information from the author). The Proposed Decision section should contain a brief recommendation on manuscript publication (i.e., “accept for publication”, “accept for publication after minor revision”, “accept for publication after major revision”, “reject”, “reject and invite the author to resubmit the manuscript for reconsideration”).

Comments for authors. The Introduction section should contain the main conclusions and describe the value of the article to readers. The Main Comments section is intended for comments on the relevance of the article to the aims and objectives of The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal and on the level of credibility and ethical conduct of the research. Comments on individual sections (i.e., the Abstract, Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, and Discussion sections), pages, paragraphs, or lines of the manuscript are given in the Specific Comments section. The Recommendations for the Author section should include the reviewer’s suggestions for improving the manuscript and, possibly, future research. The Concluding Comments section should briefly describe the strengths and weaknesses of the manuscript without giving any additional recommendations.

Manuscript evaluation criteria

Relevance to the journal. The reviewer should not waste their time reviewing irrelevant manuscripts, regardless of the quality of such manuscripts. Therefore, the first step is to determine whether the manuscript to be reviewed is pertinent to the subject area of The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal and relevant to the interests of the journal’s target audience.

Soundness. Does the work meet the necessary requirements for the study design, methods, structure, content, and depth of analysis? Does the author adhere to the principle of impartiality? Are the results reproducible? Is the study sample adequate? Has the author analysed the sample in sufficient detail to be able to make generalisations from the study findings?

Novelty. Has the research contributed anything new to the relevant subject area?

Soundness. Does the work meet the necessary requirements for the study design, methods, structure, content, and depth of analysis? Does the author adhere to the principle of impartiality? Are the results reproducible? Is the study sample adequate? Has the author analysed the sample in sufficient detail to be able to make generalisations from the study findings?

Novelty. Has the research contributed anything new to the relevant subject area?

Ethics. Does the study meet the requirements for originality? Has the institutional review board approved the study (if applicable)? Does the study meet the requirements for impartiality in terms of conflicting interests? Regardless of its perceived significance, the manuscript cannot be accepted if it is a redundant publication, contains plagiarism, or violates the basic ethical principles of scientific research (justice, beneficence, and respect for persons).

Evaluation of manuscript elements. The editors of the journal recommend using the following questions to speed up the process of preparing an expert opinion and provide the most complete information about the article to the editor and the author.

Title. Does the title accurately reflect the content of the manuscript? Will the title attract readers’ attention?

Abstract. Does the abstract appropriately present the content of the manuscript? Is the abstract structured? Does the abstract describe the aim, methods, results, and significance of the work? Are there any discrepancies between the abstract and the sections of the manuscript? Is it possible to understand the abstract without reading the manuscript?

Introduction. Is the introduction short? Are the aim and the research question stated clearly? Has the author justified the relevance and significance of the work via a literature review? If so, does the introduction meet the requirements for length? Has the author defined the terms used in the manuscript? If the manuscript is submitted to the Original Research section, does it have a clearly stated hypothesis?

Literature review. How comprehensive and complete is the literature review?

Methods. Are the methods clear? Would another researcher be able to reproduce the study using the proposed methods? Have the authors justified their choice of methods (e.g. imaging techniques, analytical tools, or statistical methods)? If the authors pose a hypothesis, have they developed methods that can reasonably test it? How is the study design presented? How does the analysis of study data help achieve the aim of the work?

Results. Are the results clear? Does the order of result presentation match the order of method description? Are the results as expected? Are there results not preceded by an appropriate description in the Methods section? How accurate is the presentation of the results?

Discussion. Is the discussion short? If not, how can it be shortened? If a hypothesis is stated, is there a report on whether it has been confirmed or refuted? If the research has not confirmed the hypothesis, have the authors answered the research question? Are the authors’ conclusions consistent with the results obtained? If the results are unexpected, have the authors analysed them appropriately? What potential contribution does the study make to the field of research and science?

Conclusions. Have the authors acknowledged the limitations of their work? Are there any additional limitations that should be pointed out? What is the authors’ opinion on the limitations? What is the authors’ opinion on the directions for future research?

References. Does the list of references conform to the requirements of the journal? Are there any bibliographical errors in the list of references? Are the references cited correctly in the text? Are there any additional important publications that should be referenced? Are there too many references? Are the referenced publications still relevant?

Tables. If the article contains tables, do they present the results correctly? Should one or more tables be added? Are the data tabulated in a way that facilitates their understanding?

Figures. Are the figures suitable for addressing the research question? Would different figures better illustrate the findings? Do the figures and graphs adequately illustrate important findings? Should changes be made to the figures and graphs for a more accurate and clear presentation of the findings? Can the figures and graphs be understood from the captions without reading the manuscript?

Disclosure. Is the information on funding and conflicts of interest clearly disclosed?

Final decision of the reviewer

The editorial staff of the journal recommend using the following reasoning for the final decision of the reviewer.

Acceptance for publication. The reviewer understands that the manuscript is ready for publication in its current version. The work is sound, ethical, and significant for the scientific community. It complements previously published works. Its writing style is clear and concise.

Acceptance after minor revision. There are a few non-critical comments about the article that need to be addressed. These comments may point out poor writing style; lack of clarity; insufficiently developed structure; errors in references; or duplication of information in the text, figures, and tables. The article may be accepted for publication after revision and re-evaluation.

Acceptance after major revision and another round of peer review. The article has serious flaws and errors affecting the validity of the obtained results. Such flaws and errors may include ethical issues, a poor research design, gaps in the description of research methods, poorly presented or misinterpreted results, an incomplete description of study limitations, contradictory conclusions (or conclusions refuted by the author’s own statements), a lack of references to important publications, or unclear tables and figures that require serious revision. After another round of peer review, the article may be accepted, rejected, or sent for additional review. This decision often requires soliciting additional information from the author.

Rejection. The work does not correspond to the aims and objectives of The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal because there are irremediable flaws or serious ethical problems, for example, the authors have not obtained consent to publication of data (if required); the authors use unethical research methods; or the authors use discredited or flawed research methods (e.g., by ignoring a process that seriously affects the results). If this is the case, the author should not submit a revised version without a specific request. The reviewer should provide detailed comments justifying their decision as such comments may help the author to significantly improve their work.

Rejection and invitation to resubmit the article for consideration. The topic or the research question is interesting, but the author uses incorrect or unreliable methods, therefore, the data obtained are unreliable. This decision may also be made if the article requires multiple changes or if it is not possible to obtain the requested additional information from the author. The authors are encouraged to conduct the study taking into account the recommendations and submit new results for consideration.

Editing of reviews

The reviews should be written in a friendly tone and correct Russian language. The reviewers must avoid derogatory personal comments, insults to the author, and unjustified criticisms of the study aspects, the language and style of the manuscript, etc.

The editorial staff of the journal attempt to send the authors unedited reviews. However, the editorial staff may edit some of the reviews without sacrificing the meaning (for example, to combine comments on the same issue received from several reviewers or to transfer confidential comments from the section intended for the author).

If a review has many mistakes or an unacceptable tone, the editorial staff of the journal have the right to send it back to the reviewer for revision.

General order of direction, reviewing and publication of articles

 

Indexation

Articles in "The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal" are indexed by several systems:

 

Publishing Ethics

AUTHORITY, AUTHORS' CONTRIBUTIONS, ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Authorship

The journal "The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal " adheres to the following criteria for authorship (developed and described in the ICMJE recommendations):

  1. Substantial contribution to the conception or planning of scientific work or the production, analysis or interpretation of this work;
  2. Drafting the manuscript or revising it critically, adding valuable intellectual content; 3. Final approval of the published version of the manuscript;
  3. Agreement to accept responsibility for all aspects of the work and an assurance that all questions related to the accuracy and integrity of any part of the work can be properly investigated and resolved.

In addition to being responsible for those parts of the work that the author performed himself, he or she should have an understanding of which co-authors are responsible for other specific components of the work. In addition, authors must be confident in the integrity of their co-authors' contributions. All persons identified as authors must meet all four criteria for being an author, and all persons meeting these four criteria must be identified as authors.

Individuals who do not meet all four criteria should be mentioned in the Acknowledgments section.

Contributions from authors and non-authors

The Acknowledgments section may include mention of people who contributed to the work but do not meet the criteria for authorship, for example: who supported the study, acted as a mentor, assisted in data collection, coordinated the study, etc.

To correctly determine the contribution, the authors of the journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal” can use one of the schemes recommended by COPE:

General Guidelines for Authorship Contributions

CRediT – Contributor Roles Taxonomy

 

Contributions from authors and non-authors

The Acknowledgments section may include mention of people who contributed to the work but do not meet the criteria for authorship, for example: who supported the study, acted as a mentor, assisted in data collection, coordinated the study, etc.

To correctly determine the contribution, the authors of the journal “History: Facts and Symbols” can use one of the schemes recommended by COPE:

General Guidelines for Authorship Contributions

CRediT – Contributor Roles Taxonomy

Responsibility

Responsibility for maintaining standards of authorship and authorial contribution rests with the editors “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal”.

Authors are required to provide transparent and correct information about the authors of the article and persons who made a significant contribution to the preparation of the article.

  If a manuscript is submitted for consideration to the journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal” by the editor-in-chief, deputy editor-in-chief, member of the editorial board or editorial council, the manuscript is reviewed only by external experts.

  To correctly determine your contribution to the preparation of an article, use the following resources:

https://www.apa.org/science/leadership/students/authorship-determination-scorecard.pdf

https://www.apa.org/science/leadership/students/authorship-tie-breaker-scorecard.pdf

Authorship Statement

The editors of the journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal” require that, along with the manuscript, authors provide a statement of authorship signed by all co-authors.

By signing the application, the authors guarantee:

  • each author who signed the statement meets the authorship criteria set out in the ethical policy of the journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal”;
  • all persons who participated in the work on the study, but are not the author, are indicated in the “Acknowledgments” section;
  • the contribution of each author is described. This information will be published in the journal ““The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal”””;
  • the authors take responsibility for the correctness of the information provided.

 Upon receipt of the article, the editor checks the availability of information about the authors and all necessary documents. If there is no statement of authorship or signatures of all authors, the article will not be accepted for consideration.

Controversy

If disputes arise about authorship, work with the article is terminated, regardless of what stage it is at.

All co-authors are informed of the occurrence of a dispute about authorship via email.

The editor of the journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal” has the right to indicate the exact period during which the authors can provide clarification on the requested questions. After this period, the article is removed from publication with appropriate explanation. If the article was published in Online First mode, explanations about the removal of the article from publication are posted in the public domain.

If a dispute arises regarding a published article, the editor of the journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal” publishes a correction, refutation, or retracts the article indicating the reason for the changes to the published document.

If it is necessary to add or exclude a co-author before or after publication, the editors of the journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal” act in accordance with the COPE rules:

https://publicationethics.org/files/authorship-a-addition-before-publication-cope-flowchart.pdf

https://publicationethics.org/node/34601

In any dispute, the editors and editor-in-chief maintain objectivity and impartiality.

To prevent manipulation of co-authorship, the editors of the journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal” use COPE flowcharts and when working with an article pay attention to the following:

  • it is indicated that the research was funded by an organization whose authors are not on the general list. This requires more careful verification of the contributions of all authors and, if necessary, seeking necessary clarification from the corresponding author.
  • the list of authors includes scientists from another scientific field. This may indicate guest authorship.
  • indication of the person in the “Acknowledgments” section without indicating a specific contribution.
  • a very long or very short list of authors, atypical for a given scientific field or type of article.
  • incomplete description of the authors' contributions: for example, lack of information about who drafted the manuscript or processed the data.
  • checking using “Anti-plagiarism” shows that there are borrowings from the dissertation work, the author of which is not listed in the list of authors.
  • articles on similar topics were published by other teams of authors.
  • the list of authors suddenly changes at the stage of publication of the article without prior discussion with the editors of the journal.
  • the author has a lot of publications, although his position does not imply such publication activity (head of department, director of the institute).
  • the corresponding author cannot respond to reviewers' comments.

 The editors of the journal The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal”” expect that organizations affiliated with the author will be willing to participate in the investigation of disputes about authorship.

COMPLAINTS AND APPEALS

The editors of "The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal " are sensitive to complaints about the conduct of editors and reviewers, which may relate to issues such as violations of confidentiality, undisclosed conflicts of interest, and misuse of confidential information obtained during the review process. Authors may also disagree with decisions regarding the expression of doubts on certain articles or complain about violations of editorial processes.

We respect the authors and their opinions.

All complaints can be sent to the journal’s e-mail; they will be considered in accordance with the general procedure. The complaint review process does not take more than 7 days. The person who filed the complaint receives information about the decision made, as well as about the measures that will be taken and the timing of their implementation.

When considering complaints, the editors rely on the COPE guidelines in each of the following cases:

Dealing with post-publication criticism

Post-publication discussions and changes

Suspicion of post-publication review manipulation

Image manipulation in a published article

Fabrication of data in a published article.

The editors ask authors to respect their colleagues and treat reviewers with understanding and respect.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

(This section was prepared according to WAME recommendations).

Conflicts of interest are conditions in which people have conflicting or competing interests that may influence an editorial decision as well as the interpretation of data in an article. Conflicts of interest may be potential or perceived, or actual. Objectivity may be affected by personal, political, financial, scientific or religious factors.

Conflicts of interest may include the following areas:

  • financial: this conflict arises when a participant in the publication process has received or expects to receive money (or other financial benefits such as patents or stock), gifts or favors that may affect the work associated with a particular publication. Examples: payment for research, fees for consultations and public speaking, etc.
  • personal relationships: this conflict arises in the case of personal relationships with family, friends, competitors, former colleagues.
  • political and religious beliefs: adherence to one religion or political party may influence the outcome of an article that analyzes these issues.
  • institutional affiliation: this conflict arises when someone involved in the publication process is directly associated with an organization that has an interest in the publication.

The editors of the journal “of "The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal" may ask the authors additional questions or request additional information if necessary.

Conflicts of interest may involve authors, reviewers and editors. The following policy statements have been prepared based on ICMJE recommendations.

Authors' responsibilities when disclosing conflicts of interest

When authors submit a manuscript of any type or format, they are required to disclose all relationships and activities that may influence or be perceived as influencing their work.

The author must notify the editor of an actual or potential conflict of interest by including information about the conflict of interest in the appropriate section of the article.

Responsibilities of reviewers when disclosing conflicts of interest

Reviewers should inform editors of any conflict of interest that may influence their opinion of a manuscript, and they should themselves recuse themselves from reviewing if there are grounds for bias. Reviewers should not take advantage of information about the work they are reviewing before it has been published.

Editors' responsibilities when disclosing conflicts of interest

Editors making final decisions on manuscripts should recuse themselves from editorial decisions where there is a conflict of interest or relationship that may create potential conflicts related to the articles under review. Other editorial staff involved in making editorial decisions should inform the editors of their current interests (since they can influence editorial decisions), and independently refuse to make decisions if there is a conflict of interest. Editorial staff should not use information obtained while working with manuscripts for personal purposes. Editors should regularly publish reports of potential conflicts of interest involving themselves and journal staff. Guest editors must follow the same procedures.

Articles by the editor-in-chief of the journal, deputy editor-in-chief of the journal, members of the editorial board and the editorial council of the journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal” must clearly indicate the connection with the journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal”.

 In the event that an undisclosed conflict of interest is discovered in an unpublished article, the editors of the journal "The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal" act in accordance with the COPE guidelines.

In the event that an undisclosed conflict of interest is discovered in a published article, the editors of the journal "The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal" act in accordance with COPE guidelines.

DATA REUSE AND REPRODUCTION

This section of the policy is based on COPE's data management guidelines.

Providing authors with access to data obtained during the study that substantiates the content of their publications is encouraged, but is not obligatory. The authors' consent to provide access to research data does not influence the decision to publish.

Definition of research data

Research data includes any factual materials recorded on any medium used in the process of obtaining research results, in digital or non-digital form. This includes tabular data, code, images, audio and video files, documents, maps, processed and/or raw data. This policy applies to research data that may be required to support the accuracy of research findings reported in The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal articles. Research data includes information obtained directly from the authors (“primary data”) as well as data from other sources analyzed by the authors during the course of the study (“secondary data”).

Definition of exceptions

This policy does not apply to research data that is not required to support the validity of the results reported in published articles.

Information about data that is not subject to disclosure may be transferred in the following ways: posted in research data repositories with limited access; previously anonymized. The author may also make publicly available only the metadata of the research data and/or a description of how to access it at the request of other scientists.

Data storage

The preferred method of sharing data is through data repositories. If you need help choosing a repository to host your data, see the list of repositories at: https://repositoryfinder.datacite.org/.

Citing data

The editors of the journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal” welcome access to research data under free Creative Commons licenses. The editors of the journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal” do not insist on the mandatory use of free licenses when data is hosted in third-party repositories. The publisher of the journal " The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal " does not claim ownership of the research data provided by the author along with the article.

Letters with questions about compliance with this policy can be sent to the executive secretary of the journal " The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal".

ETHICAL OVERSIGHT

The scientific journal " The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal” shares COPE's view that publication ethics includes not only ensuring the integrity and reliability of published research, but also ethical behavior regarding the subjects of research. This category includes vulnerable populations, laboratory animals, human subjects (where appropriate research is conducted), sensitive data, and business/marketing practices.

Vulnerable populations

Vulnerable populations include (but are not limited to) those who are unable to protect their own interests: pregnant women, newborns, children, fetuses in the womb, prisoners, the disabled, the mentally retarded, the economically disadvantaged, hospitalized patients in serious condition, etc. .

Research in vulnerable populations should only be planned if these groups will benefit from the research.

One of the concerns is that not all study participants, for objective reasons, can understand all the conditions of the study. If informed consent cannot be obtained from the direct participant in the study, this consent must be signed by his legal representative. Particular attention should be paid to studies involving children.

 The editors of " The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal " support COPE's commitment to publishing research related to vulnerable populations.

 Authors of articles must obtain informed consent for publication and report this to the editors of the journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal.”

Working with confidential data

The right to privacy of individuals or organizations involved in research is of paramount importance and should not be violated without their informed consent. Authors must take all necessary precautions to protect the information of research participants. Where necessary, authors must take measures to minimize any potential physical and psychological harm to study participants.

POST-PUBLICATION DISCUSSIONS AND CHANGES TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES

In some cases, it becomes necessary to make changes to an already published article. The editors of the journal "The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal" support the practice of making changes to published materials and, if necessary, act in accordance with COPE recommendations.

 Any necessary changes will be accompanied by a post-publication notice, which will always be linked to the original version of the article so that readers are kept informed of any necessary changes. The editors of the journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal” use Expression of Doubt, Correction or Retraction of an article. The purpose of this practice is to ensure the integrity of scientific materials.

All corrections, expressions of doubt and notices of retraction of the article are publicly available.

What should authors do if they discover an error in their article?

Authors may discover a technical or semantic error after the article has been published. In this case, authors should notify the editors of the journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal” as soon as possible, especially in the case of errors that may affect the interpretation of the results or cast doubt on the reliability of the information. The author responsible for the correspondence is responsible for reaching agreement in the team of authors on further interaction with the editors.

If you feel that changes need to be made to a published article, please contact us via the email address listed on the site vestnik_sibadi@sibadi.org

Algorithm for making changes to the article

Correction

Corrections are made to the article if it is necessary to correct an error or add missing information that does not affect the integrity and scientific significance of the article.

Corrections may be made, for example, to the caption, information about research funding may be added, or conflict of interest information may be clarified.

If such changes are made, a separate correction notice will be posted. The general algorithm of actions is as follows:

  • the correction is made to the original version of the article;
  • Crossmark entry is updated;
  • in the “Abstract” field of the original version of the article, a description of the change made is entered;
  • a message about the correction is published, which contains information about the original version of the article, the names of the authors, a description of the essence of the correction, as well as links to it.

Messages about corrections of spelling errors, typos, and other minor changes are not published separately. The site reports that corrections have been made to the article (without details).

Article retraction

The editors of the journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal” decide on the need to retract an article in the following cases:

  • when there is clear evidence that the results are unreliable for a number of reasons: there are serious errors in the calculations, falsified data, manipulation of images;
  • plagiarism was detected in the article;
  • the results had already been published previously in other journals and the author did not justify the need for re-publication and did not warn the editor about this;
  • the article contains materials and data for which permission to use has not been obtained;
  • copyright has been violated or another serious legal problem has arisen (for example, confidentiality has been violated);
  • research ethics was violated;
  • the review process has been compromised;
  • the author did not disclose a conflict of interest, which, in the opinion of the editor, could influence the decision of the reviewer or editor to publish the article.

The editors of the journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal” act according to the following algorithm when it is necessary to retract an article:

investigate and ensure that retraction is necessary;

prepare a message about the retraction: include in the title the note “Retraction of the article” and the title of the article, describe the reason for the retraction, indicate on whose initiative it is being carried out, provide a link to the retracted article;

publish a message about retraction;

replace the original version of the retracted article, noting in the pdf file that the article has been retracted;

report retraction to databases;

transmit information about the retraction of an article to the Database of Retracted Articles.

 The editors of the journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal” work with retracted articles in accordance with COPE regulations.

Expression of doubt

The editors of the journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal” report expressing doubts in the following cases:

  • serious concerns have been raised about the published article, but the investigation has not been able to prove anything, or for some reason the investigation will not be carried out or cannot be completed for a long time. At the same time, it is necessary to notify readers of what is happening as soon as possible.

Once the investigation is complete, the article may be amended or retracted.

Deleting an article

Articles from The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal are removed only in extreme cases when it is impossible to follow the protocol for making changes, retracting an article, or expressing doubt.

An article may be deleted in the following cases:

  • if dissemination of the article may pose a serious risk;
  • if the article contains content that violates the right to privacy of a research participant;
  • if the article violates rights;
  • if the article is subject to deletion by court decision.

If an article is deleted, all materials are deleted from the journal’s website, requests are sent to databases with a request to remove the full text and post a message about the deletion of the article.

UPDATES AND POST-PUBLICATION DISCUSSIONS OF ARTICLES

Addition to the published article

The author may need to supplement the article some time after its publication. In this case, the editors of the journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal” may publish an addition to the article. Additions to the article must be checked by the journal editors and may be sent for review.

When an addition is published, the file with the original version of the article is updated, and a notice about the addition to the article is additionally placed in the current issue of the journal, including information about the article, its authors, the essence of the changes made and a link to the article.

Comment on a published article

Comments are short pieces that may express an opinion or observation about a published article. Comments are sent to reviewers and authors of the article so that they have the opportunity to prepare a response to the comment.

The authors' comments are also sent to the reviewer. The author of the comment will have the opportunity to respond to the authors again, after which correspondence between the author of the comment and the authors of the article can continue in private.

The decision to publish comments is made by the editor of the journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal.” Comments, replies, and rejoinders are linked to the original version of the article to which they relate.

RESPONSIBILITY OF THE MANAGEMENT STAFF OF THE JOURNAL: EDITORIAL BOARD, EDITORS, PUBLISHER, FOUNDER

Principles for forming the editorial board

The editors of the journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal.” are guided by the principles of COPE when forming the editorial board/council.

Potential members of the editorial board/council may be recommended to the editor-in-chief by actual members of the editorial board/council, reviewers and authors.

Editors who wish to participate in the work of the journal as a member of the editorial board/council can send an application to the editor-in-chief.

All potential members of the editorial board/council must agree to the following terms:

a member of the editorial board/council of the journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal” cannot be an editor who holds the same position in more than…………

a member of the editorial board/council of the journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal” cannot be an editor who is simultaneously invited to work on a special issue for another journal;

a member of the editorial board/council of the journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal” cannot be an editor who is simultaneously responsible for making final decisions on the publication of manuscripts in another journal;

all potential members of the editorial board/council must be prepared to provide the editorial board of the journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal” with information about all potential and actual conflicts of interest (for example, about any activity in publishing scientific journals and books, membership in the editorial boards/councils of others journals, as well as any conflicts of interest that may arise following their appointment).

Responsibilities of a member of the editorial board/council:

  • publication of 1 article per year to support the journal;
  • reviewing incoming manuscripts according to one’s own profile and in the absence of external reviewers. Each member of the editorial board/council receives no more than 2 manuscripts per year for review. Reviewing must be carried out in accordance with the approved Review Policy of the journal "The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal".
  • selection of reviewers for incoming articles at the request of the executive secretary, control of the review process of incoming articles.
  • making decisions on the possibility of publishing an article after all rounds of review. Decisions are passed on to the editor-in-chief, who makes the final decision on the possibility of publication.
  • inviting authors and reviewers to collaborate with the journal.

A member of the editorial board/council may be dismissed from his position for the following reasons:

violation of publication ethics: concealment of conflicts of interest, information, use of status for personal purposes;

failure to fulfill assigned duties during the year without a good reason and without the consent of the editor-in-chief;

at the request of a member of the editorial board/council.

Privileges of a member of the editorial board/council

  • articles by members of the editorial board/council of the journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal” are considered as a priority;
  • a member of the editorial board/council can participate free of charge in events organized by the journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal” and the founding organization;
  • a member of the editorial board/council can act as a guest editor for a special issue of the journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal”;
  • information about a member of the editorial board/council is posted on the website of the journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal” with the necessary links to profiles in databases, affiliations and other necessary data.

The participation of potential candidates for the role of member of the editorial board/council is considered at regular meetings of the editorial board/council.

The final decision on whether to include a potential candidate on the editorial board/council is made by the editor-in-chief.

Editor's Responsibility

The editor of the scientific journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal” is personally and independently responsible for making the decision to publish the article. The final decision on publication is made by the journal's editor-in-chief.

The editor of the journal "The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal" is guided by the journal's policies when reviewing an article and deciding on its publication.

The editor-in-chief may discuss the article and the reviewer's comments with other editors and reviewers, provided that these discussions are justified and legal without using the materials discussed for personal purposes.

The editor of "The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal" is required to evaluate the content of a manuscript regardless of the race, gender, sexual orientation, religious views, origin, citizenship, or political preferences of the authors.

The editor of the journal "The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal" must ensure confidentiality and not unnecessarily disclose information about the manuscript to third parties (with the exception of other journal editors, reviewers, the publisher and the founder).

The editor of the journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal” is obliged to inform the editor-in-chief about all conflict situations, as well as the discovery of critical errors or accusations of authors or reviewers of violating publication ethics submitted to the journal, in order to take the necessary actions in such cases: making changes, publication of refutations, retraction of an article, expression of doubts.

The Editor of The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal participates in the investigation of any ethical violations concerning manuscripts under review and published articles, and makes every effort to resolve conflicts as quickly as possible. When necessary, the editor of History: Facts and Symbols will work with the author's organization to conduct a more in-depth investigation.

Publisher's responsibility

The publisher of the journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal” is responsible for compliance with all modern recommendations and requirements for maintaining the integrity of scientific materials published in the journal.

The publisher follows the policy of the journal The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal regarding receiving compensation for the preparation and publication of manuscripts, as well as receiving profits from advertising and reprints. The publisher of The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal does not allow potential profits from advertising and reprints to influence the editors' decision to publish a manuscript.

The publisher of the journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal” does not interfere in editorial processes, however, if necessary and at the request of the editors, it can take part in the investigation of violations of publication ethics, as well as send official requests on its own behalf to scientific and educational organizations, as well as other publishing houses.

The publisher of the journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal” is obliged to introduce industry standards into the work of the publishing house in order to improve the ethical component of the journal’s work.

The publisher of the journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal” is obliged to provide comprehensive legal support to the editorial board if necessary.

Founder's responsibility

The founder of the journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal” adheres to the principle of editorial independence: the director of the founding organization and its employees do not interfere in the editorial process.

The founder of the journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal” can recommend potential members of the editorial board/editorial council, reviewers and authors, but the final decision on the possibility of cooperation with them is made only by the editor-in-chief.

The founder of " The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal " supports the need for geographic and gender diversity among editorial board members, reviewers, and authors.

The founder of the scientific journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal” does not put financial and political gain above the quality of the journal. The editors of the journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal” make decisions about publishing manuscripts based on their quality and interest for the journal’s target audience.

The founder of the journal “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal” does not interfere in editorial processes, however, if necessary and at the request of the editors, he can take part in the investigation of violations of publication ethics, as well as send official requests on his own behalf to scientific and educational organizations, as well as other publishing houses.

 

Founder

The founder of the The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal is the Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education “The Siberian State Automobile and Highway University (SibADI)”, Omsk, Russia. https://sibadi.org

 

Publication fees

Publication in our Journal is free for authors. We do not charge publication fees for processing, publishing and making articles accessible online.

It is confirmed by the Ministry of Digital Development, Communications and Mass Media of the Russian Federation that The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal is not aimed at publishing advertisements or erotic content, and is eligible for the benefits allowed under Article 164, Part Two of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation.

The Journal production is funded by the Founder.

 

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer’s own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.

Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

 

Plagiarism detection

"The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal" use native russian-language plagiarism detection software Antiplagiat to screen the submissions. If plagiarism is identified, the COPE guidelines on plagiarism will be followed.

 

Preprint and postprint Policy

The editorial board of the "The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal" allows authors to post the manuscript as a preprint before submission for review and to archive independently their articles in disciplinary and institutional repositories.

 

Preprints

The editorial board of the "The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal" encourages uploading preprints on preprint servers. The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) defines a preprint as 'a scholarly manuscript posted by the author(s) in an openly accessible platform, usually before or in parallel with the peer review process.' 

A preprint publication shall not be considered duplicate publication nor shall it influence the editor's decision to publish it in the "The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal".

The author must notify the editorial board of the "The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal" about the posted preprint at submission of the manuscript for review, furnishing a link to the preprint with its DOI identifier and the dissemination terms and conditions.

It is the author’s responsibility to add a link to the published manuscript in the preprint record. The link must contain the DOI and the URL of the article published on the journal's website. The original preprint should not be modified based on the reviewer’s and editor’s comments. The preprint should not be replaced with the text of the published article.

Do not delete the preprint text.

Manuscripts Accepted for Publication

The editorial board of the "The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal" allows manuscripts that have been reviewed and are accepted for publication to be archived independently.

This version of the manuscript may be disseminated through:

  • personal website or blog;
  • institutional repository;
  • disciplinary repository;
  • direct interactions with faculty or students by providing this version of the manuscript for personal use.

The text of the manuscript should contain the author’s clarifications about its status and information about the planned publication.

Example: The ARTICLE TITLE has been reviewed, accepted for publication, and will be published in 2021 (3) of the "The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal".

Once the final version of the manuscript is published, it is the author’s responsibility to add a link to the published article to the publication record. The posted text should not be modified based on the reviewer’s and editor’s comments. Do not replace the text of the posted manuscript. Do not delete the text of the posted manuscript.

Final Versions of Manuscripts

The editorial board of the "The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal"allows manuscripts that have been peer-reviewed, accepted for publication, edited and ready for publication (proofread and typeset) to be archived independently.

 This version of the manuscript may be disseminated through:

  • personal website or blog;
  • institutional repository;
  • disciplinary repository;
  • direct interactions with faculty or students by providing this version of the manuscript for personal use.

 Once the final version of the manuscript is published, it is the author’s responsibility to add a link to the published article to the publication record. The posted text should not be modified based on the reviewer’s and editor’s comments. Do not replace the text of the posted manuscript. Do not delete the text of the posted manuscript.

Last updated January 2024.

 

Retraction

The Editorial Office of the “The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal” does not review research articles simultaneously submitted to other Publication Offices, as well as manuscripts that, for the most part, have already been published somewhere as an article or a part of another work. In case of this fact discovery, the Editors of the journal will be forced to retract such publications.

The retraction rules of the published papers are based on the guidelines, recommendations and standards of international professional organizations, primarily the Committee on Publication Ethics (Committee on Publication Ethics – COPE).

Reasons for retraction:

  • incorrect and/or unethical quotation (plagiarism) in the published paper;
  • paper duplication in several publications;
  • self-plagiarism with a large amount of repetition of research results and text fragments;
  • fraudulent use of data: falsification and fabrication detection (for example, manipulation of experimental data);
  • research misconduct: serious error detection (for example, incorrect interpretation of research data) that cast doubt on its scientific value;
  • ethical misconduct: incorrect composition of authors (the absence of the person’s name who is worthy of being an author and the presence of the names who do not meet the authorship criteria);
  • hidden conflict of interest;
  • paper re-publication without the consent of the author;
  • other violations.

Paper retraction from a journal is carried out:

  • by the authors’ request or by other initiative persons with the Retraction Notice about identified violations;
  • by the Publisher or the Editorial Office initiative.

The article retraction process does not depend on the paper publication date in which violations were found. The procedure for paper retracting is carried out after an investigation has been carried out and a decision has been made by the Editor-in-Chief and the Editorial Board of the scientific journal based on the results of the investigation. The decision to retract the paper is documented in the Retraction Notice of the Editorial Board of the journal.

Having made a decision to retract the article, the Editors indicate the reason for the retraction (in case of plagiarism detection, the sources of borrowing), as well as the date of retraction. The article and description of it remains on the journal’s website as part of the corresponding issue of the journal, but the electronic version of the text is marked with the inscription: “RETRACTED” and the date of retraction; the same mark is placed in the paper and in the issue contents.

When paper retraction procedure completes, retraction information is sent to all national and foreign information resources where journal is indexed or placed.

The Minutes of the Meeting of the Editorial Board of the journal is also sent to the author (authorized author in the case of collective authorship) of the retracted paper and the corresponding author about presence of grounds for retracting the paper. Retracted papers (metadata and full text) remain on the elibrary.ru platform with a mark that the paper has been retracted (in the metadata and in the full text, which is also supplemented with the inscription “RETRACTED”).

The same information is passed to the Ethics Committee for Scientific Publications of the Association of Scientific Editors and Publishers (ANRI) for inclusion to the Database of the Retracted Articles.

The editors of the journal do not consider manuscripts simultaneously submitted to other editions, as well as manuscripts the most part of which has already been published somewhere in the form of an article or as a part of another work. If the editors observe such facts, they  retract (withdraw) such manuscripts.

2016.

The retraction of the manuscript by Miller A.E. Justification of the options for planning changes in production activities // Vestnik SibADI. 2016. No. 1 (47). P. 121–128.

The manuscript “Justification of the options for planning changes in production activities” by Miller Alexander Emelyanovich, aem55@yandex.ru in the scientific journal Vestnik SibADI (2016. No. 1 (47). P. 121–128) is retracted from print by editors with the consent of the publisher. The retraction of the paper is due to the identification of large-scale borrowings from the following source: Golofast Vadim Leonidovich. Planning changes in production activity: on the example of machine-building enterprises: Dissertation of the Candidate of Economic Sciences: 08.00.05 / Golofast Vadim Leonidovich [Omsk State University named after F.M. Dostoevsky]. – Omsk, 2012.

The minutes of the meeting of the Editorial Board of the “Vestnik SibADI / The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal” dated 05.09.2019.

2014

The retraction of the manuscript by Miller A.E., Kryuchkov V.N. Prerequisites for changes in production and business // Vestnik SibADI. 2014. No. 1 (35). P. 146–155.

The manuscript “Prerequisites for changes in production and business” by Miller Alexander Emelyanovich, aem55@yandex.ru and Vladimir Kryuchkov Nikolaevich in the scientific journal Vestnik SibADI (2014. No. 1 (35). P. 146–155) is retracted from print by editors with the consent of the publisher.
The retraction of the paper is due to the identification of large-scale borrowings from the following source: Golofast Vadim Leonidovich. Planning changes in production activity: on the example of machine-building enterprises: Dissertation of the Candidate of Economic Sciences: 08.00.05 / Golofast Vadim Leonidovich [Omsk State University named after F.M. Dostoevsky]. – Omsk, 2012.

The minutes of the meeting of the Editorial Board of the “Vestnik SibADI / The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal” dated 05.09.2019.

 

CrossMark

CrossMark is a multi-publisher initiative from Crossref, provides a standard way for readers to locate the authoritative version of an article or other published content. By applying the CrossMark logo,  "The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal" is committing to maintaining the content it publishes and to alerting readers to changes if and when they occur.

Clicking the CrossMark logo on a document will tell you its current status and may also give you additional publication-record information about the document.

 

Information on rejected manuscripts

The average rejection rates at 40 per cent, and is attributed exclusively to the quality of the submitted materials regardless of any other criteria.     

Article Writing Services: manuscripts written by means of Article Writing Services are not accepted. The authors are required to disclose to the editor information on this type of publication.

 

Data Sharing Policy

Authors are encouraged to make the research data that support their publications available but are not required to do so. The decision to publish will not be affected by whether or not authors share their research data.

Definition of research data

This policy applies to the research data that would be required to verify the results of research reported in articles published in the journal "The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal". Research data include data produced by the authors (“primary data”) and data from other sources that are analysed by authors in their study (“secondary data”). Research data includes any recorded factual material that are used to produce the results in digital and non-digital form. This includes tabular data, code, images, audio, documents, video, maps, raw and/or processed data.

Definition of exceptions

The data that is not a subject to public disclosure may be delivered as follows: deposited in science data repositories with limited access or preliminary anonymised. An author can also publicly deliver metadata only and/or description of the method of access to the data under requests from other scholars.

Data repositories

The preferred mechanism for sharing research data is via data repositories. Please see or https://repositoryfinder.datacite.org/ for help finding research data repositories.

Data citation

The Editorial Board of the Journal "The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal" "The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal"welcomes access to data under Creative Commons Licenses. Editorial Board of the Journal  "The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal"does not insist on the obligatory use of Creative Commons in case when the data is deposited in the repositories of the third party. The Publisher of the Journal  "The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal"does not assert any copyrights for the data submitted by the author together with the article.  

Questions regarding the observation of that policy shall be sent to the executive secretary of the Journal  "The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal".

 Last updated January 2024.



644050, Omsk, Mira street, 5, SibADI
Tel.: +7 (3812) 65-03-09
e-mail: vestnik_sibadi@sibadi.org

Processing of personal data
supported by NEICON (Elpub lab)