COMPRESSED FLANGES OF ARCHED STEEL THIN-WALLED COLD-ROLLED PROFILED SHEETS: DETERMINATION OF RESIDUAL STRESSES
https://doi.org/10.26518/2071-7296-2019-6-758-765
Abstract
Introduction. The construction sphere widely uses steel thin-walled cold-formed profiles. In arched steel coldformed trapezoidal section profiles, residual normal stresses oriented along the profile occur at the stage of manufacturing arched blanks from flat profiled sheets and are caused by the cold bending process involving the extreme zones of the profile in the plastic stage with unloading without subsequent heat treatment. According to preliminary estimates, the residual stresses are up to one third of the calculated resistance of sheet steel at small radii of the arch profile. At present, the researchers do not take into account the residual technological stresses of the longitudinal bending when designing structures from thin-walled longitudinally bent rolled trapezoidal sections. The purpose of the paper is to develop a method for determining residual stresses in compressed flanges of arched steel thin-walled cold-rolled profiled sheets, which provides simplicity of the measurement and calculation methods, reliability and high accuracy of the obtained stress values.
Materials and methods. The authors made the analysis of previously published materials and identified the advantages and disadvantages of previous studies. Moreover, the authors showed the advantages of the proposed method for determining the residual technological normal stresses in compressed flanges of arched steel thin-rolled profiled steel.
Results. The researches formed a new method for making sections of a compressed shelf and measuring residual normal stresses in the compressed flanges of an arched steel sheet of cold-rolled profiled steel. The proposed method greatly simplified the existing method of determining residual technological normal stresses in compressed profile flanges, improved the accuracy of measuring normal stresses in compressed profile flanges.
Discussion and conclusions. The method of measuring residual process stresses allows improving existing methods for determining residual stresses, simplifying calculations, as well as improving the accuracy of stresses. In the future, the authors will make a numerical simulation of the bending arch profiles, as well as an experimental assessment of the adequacy of the proposed method.
The authors have read and approved the final manuscript. Financial transparency: the authors have no financial interest in the presented materials or methods. There is no conflict of interest.
About the Authors
S. A. MakeevRussian Federation
Sergey A. Makeev – Dr. of Sci. (Engineering), Professor, Department of Building Construction
644080, Omsk, 5, Mira Ave.
V. A. Gorkovenko
Russian Federation
Viktor A. Gorkovenko – Postgraduate Student, Department of Building construction
644080, Omsk, 5, Mira Ave.
E. A. Seitov
Russian Federation
Erlan A. Seitov – Postgraduate Student, Department of Building construction
644080, Omsk, 5, Mira Ave.
L. F. Rahuba
Russian Federation
Lilia F. Rahuba – Cand. of Sci. (Pedagogical), Associate Professor of the Foreign Languages Department
644080, Omsk, 5, Mira Ave.
References
1. Zhdanov D., Ulasevitch W. Beskarkasnoe arochnye pokrytiya iz stal’nyh tonkostennyh profilej istoriya, sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy primeneniya v Respublike Belarus’ [Frameless arch coverings made of thin-walled steel profiles: history, current state and prospects of application in the Republic of Belarus]. Vestn. Brest. gos. tekhn. un-ta. 2016; 1: Stroitel’stvo i arhitektura: 30–34 (in Russian).
2. Liplenko M.A., Ayrumyan E.L., Kamenshchikov N.I. Perspektivy LSTK v Rossii [Prospects of lsts in Russia]. StrojPROFI, 2013; 10: 12–17 (in Russian).
3. Vedjakov I. I., Solov’ev D. V., Armenskij M. Ju. Novye tipy beskarkasnyh zdanij i perspektivy ih razvitija [New types and prospects of carkless buildings]. Promyshlennoe i grazhdanskoe stroitel’stvo. 2009; 10: 27–29. (in Russian).
4. Rudak A. V., Beljaev N. V. Ograzhdajushhie konstrukcii iz tonkolistovogo trapecievidnogo profi-lj [Enclosing structures of thin-sheet trapezoidal profile] Vestnik Sibirskoj gosudarstvennoj avtomobil’no-dorozhnoj akademii. 2009; 3 (13): 40–45 (in Russian).
5. Krasotina L.V., Krasnoshchekov Yu.V., Mosenkis Yu.M. Ispol’zovanie arochnogo profnastila pri rekonstrukcii zdanij [Use of arched corrugated board during the reconstruction of buildings]. Vestnik SibADI. 2009; 4 (14): 41–45 (in Russian).
6. Liplenko M. A., Ayrumyan E.L. Osobennosti raboty beskarkasnyh arochnyh pokrytij iz stal’nyh holodnognutyh profilej [Features of work of frameless arch coverings from steel cold-formed profiles]. Promyshlennoe i grazhdanskoe stroitel’stvo. 2011; 6: 42–44 (in Russian).
7. Zhdanov D. A., Ulasevich V. P. K opredeleniju jeffektivnyh sechenij stal’nyh beskarkasnyh arochnyh pokrytij po Evrokodu [To the definition of effective sections of steel arc-free arch coatings on the Eurocode]. Stroitel’naja nauka i tehnika. 2013; 2: 22–26. (in Russian).
8. Eremeev P.G., Kiselev D.B., Armenskij M.Ju. K proektirovaniju beskarkasnyh konstrukcij aroch-nyh svodov iz holodnognutyh tonkolistovyh stal’nyh profile [To design of arch-free structures of arched arches from cold-bent thin-sheet steel profiles]. Montazhnye i special’nye raboty v stroitel’stve. 2004; 7: 2–3. (in Russian).
9. Krasotina L. V., Krasnoshekov Ju. V., Makeev S. A., Selivanov A. V. Rezul’taty jeksperimental’-nogo povedenija nesushhego arochnogo pokrytija iz trapecievidnogo profilja [Results of experimental behavior of bearing arch coating from trapezoidal profile]. Omskij nauchnyj vestnik. 2007; 2 (56): 38–42. (in Russian).
10. Liplenko M.A. Metod nagruzhenija arochnyj konstrukcii pri ispytanijah [Method of loading arch structure during tests]. Stroitel’naja mehanika i raschet sooruzhenij. 2014; 3 (254): 57–61. (in Russian).
11. Liplenko M.A., Kunin Ju. S., Volodin M. V. Jeksperimental’nye issledovanija profilirovannogo nastila novogo tipa [Experimental studies of profiled flooring of new type]. Stroitel’naja mehanika i raschet sooruzhenij. 2015;6 (263): 67–76 (in Russian).
12. Quach W. M., Teng J. G., Chung K. F. Residual stresses in steel sheets due to coiling and uncoiling: a closed-form analytical solution. Engineering Structures. 2004; 26, iss. 9: 1249–1259. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.04.005.
13. Quach W. M., Teng J. G., Chung K. F. Residual stresses in press-braked stainless steel sections. I: Coiling and uncoiling of sheets. Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 2009; 65, iss. 8–9: 1803-1815. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.04.007.
14. Quach W. M., Teng J. G., Chung K. F. Residual stresses in press-braked stainless steel sections. II: Press-braking operations. Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 2009; 65, iss. 8–9:1816-1826. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.04.011.
15. Cristopher D. Moen, Takeru Igusa, Schafer B. W. Prediction of residual stresses and strains in coldformed steel members. Thin-Walled Structures. 2008; 46, iss. 11: 1274–1289. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2008.02.002.
16. Jacques Rondal. Residual stresses in cold rolled profiles. Construction and Building Materials, 1987; 1, iss. 3: 150–164. DOI: 10.1016/0950-0618(87)90016-X.
17. Makeev S.A., Kolmakov D.M. Modelirovanie ostatochnyh napryazhenij v arochnom tonkostennom prokate trapecievidnogo secheniya [Modeling of residual stresses in arched thin-walled rolling of a trapezoidal section]. Omskiy nauchnyy vestnik. 2014; 1 (127): 69–73 (in Russian).
18. Makeev S A, Grishaev N A Chislennyj analiz prochnosti i mestnoj ustojchivosti arochnyh profilej trapecievidnogo secheniya s uchetom ostatochnyh napryazhenij prodol’nogo giba [Numerical analysis of strength and local stability of trapezoidal arched profiles taking into account residual stresses of longitudinal bending]. Stroitel’naya mekhanika i raschet sooruzhenij. 2010; 2: 37–40 (in Russian).
19. Makeev S A et al. Metody rascheta i ispytanij legkih ograzhdayushchih konstrukcij [Methods of calculation and testing of light enclosure structures]. OmSTU, 2016, 124 p (in Russian).
20. Kholkin E.G., Sokolovskiy Z.N. Metodika rascheta trapecievidnyh tonkostennyh profilej s uchetom mestnoj poteri ustojchivosti [Design of trapezoid thinwalled profiles taking into account local loss of stability]. Omskij nauchnyj vestnik. 2010; 3: 50–53 (in Russian).
21. Ulasevich V. P., Zhdanov D. A. Deformacionnyj raschet beskarkasnyh arochnyh pokrytij iz stal’nyh tonkostennyh holodnognutyh profilej [Deformation calculation of cartless arch coatings made of steel thin-walled cold-bent profiles]. Vestn. Brest. gos. tehn. un-ta. Stroitel’stvo i arhitektura. 2015; 1: 66–72. (in Russian).
22. Makeev S. A., Grishaev N. A. Chislennoe issledovanie mestnoj ustojchivosti arochnyh profilej trapecievidnogo sechenija [Numerical study of local stability of arched profiles of trapezoidal section]. Omskij nauchnyj vestnik. 2010; 1 (87): 93–97 (in Russian).
23. Kuz’min D. A. Matematicheskaja model’ tonkostennyh svjazej v sostave trehslojnyh cilindricheskih pokrytij [Mathematical model of thin-walled bonds in the composition of three-layer cylindrical coatings]. Vestnik SibADI. 2012; 4 (26): 41–48 (in Russian).
24. Rudak A. V., Makeev S. A. Matematicheskaja model’ beskarkasnogo dvuhslojnogo arochnogo svoda iz holodnognutyh tonkolistovyh stal’nyh profilej [Mathematical model of a double-layer arch-free vault of cold-bent thin-sheet steel profiles]. Stroitel’naja mehanika i raschet sooruzhenij. 2009; 2: 1–6 (in Russian).
25. Seitov E. A., Makeev S. A. Sposob opredelenija ostatochnyh naprjazhenij v arochnyh profiljah [Method of determining residual stresses in arch profiles]. Dinamika sistem, mehanizmov i mashin. 2019; 7, № 1: 146–153 (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Makeev S.A., Gorkovenko V.A., Seitov E.A., Rahuba L.F. COMPRESSED FLANGES OF ARCHED STEEL THIN-WALLED COLD-ROLLED PROFILED SHEETS: DETERMINATION OF RESIDUAL STRESSES. The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal. 2019;16(6):758-765. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26518/2071-7296-2019-6-758-765