INDICATORS AND CRITERIA FOR ASSESSMENT OF MULTIFUNCTIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF RURAL TERRITORIES
https://doi.org/10.26518/2071-7296-2018-2-321-329
Abstract
Introduction. The article is devoted to the rural development assessment. The research briefly describes the methodological approaches and methods of domestic and foreign authors, devoted to the problems of rural development.
Methods and materials. Emphasis is paid to the substantiation of quantitative and qualitative indicators in the original author’s methodology for assessing the level of the rural areas’ development. Indicators are selected basing on the complexity and versatility of rural development. The system of criteria is demonstrated and calculation procedure of assessment points is shown.
Results. The authors identify five basic functions of rural areas, developed and presented by the author’s methodology for monitoring the dynamic and including thirty-one indicators, which allow to assess the changes in rural area over the years.
Discussion. The approach to the implementation of the proposed methodology is considered taking into account the main components: industrial, socio-demographic, economic, environmental, administrative and managerial. In addition, it is established that to obtain reliable results, researchers need to have accessible and transparent source data. It is also concluded that the goals and objectives of the research on the rural areas’ development should be specified or measured.
Conclusion. As a result, the author method application of multifunctional rural areas’ development allows us to objectively detect the dynamics of changes, to give evaluation of their development level and to overcome the negative and support the positive trends.
About the Authors
O. V. Kosenchuk
Omsk State Agrarian University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, Associate Professor, Dean of the Faculty “Zootechnics, Commodity Science and Standardization”,
644008, Omsk, 1, Institutskaya Sq.
A. V. Zinich
Omsk State Agrarian University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department “Management and Marketing”,
644008, Omsk, 1, Institutskaya Sq., 8
References
1. Andrea Bonfiglio Chiodo, E. A Regional Impact Analysis of European Policies in Rural Areas. URL:http://ecsocman. hse.ru/data/135/673/1219/87EAAE_Bonfiglio_Chiodo.pdf (date of access 26.12.2017)
2. By Jacobs, I.A., Olanrewaju, T.O., Chukwudi, P.O. (2017). Comparative assessment of rural development programs of selected ngos in plateau state, northcentral, Nigeria. Journal of Rural Social Sciences, vol. 32, no. 1, URL:https://www. questia.com/library/journal/1P4-1950036989/comparativeassessment-of-rural-development-programs (date of access 22.03.2018)
3. Li, Y., Long, H., Liu, Y. (2015). Spatio-temporal pattern of China’s rural development: A rurality index perspective. Journal of Rural Studies, vol. 38, april 01, 2015, рр. 12-26. URL:https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0- 84922321671&origin=inward&txGid=6fe6483e84c431a381a 26d969e16452c (date of access 22.03.2018).
4. Adukova A.N. Ocenka upravleniya razvitiem sel’skih territorij v stranah mira [Assessment of rural development management in the countries of the world]. Ehkonomika, trud, upravlenie v sel’skom hozyajstve. 2016. vol. 26. no. 1. pp. 92- 94.
5. Antonova N.I. Formy razvitiya sel’skih territorij i principy ocenki ih ehffekti nosti [Forms of development of rural areas and principles for assessing their effectiveness]. V sbornike: Perspektivy razvitiya sel’skogo hozyajstva Rossijskoj Federacii: innovacionno-tekhnologicheskie parametry, formy territorial’noj organizacii materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoprakticheskoj konferencii, 2016, no. 5, pp. 210-215.
6. Vorob’eva V.V., Vorob’ev S.P., CHernyh A.A. Ocenka vliyaniya lichnyh podsobnyh hozyajstv na social’noehkonomicheskoe razvitie sel’skih territorij Altajskogo kraya [Estimation of influence of private subsidiary farms on social and economic development of rural territories of Altai Krai]. Konkurentosposobnost’ v global’nom mire: ehkonomika, nauka, tekhnologii, 2016, no. 4, pp. 20-24.
7. Gricenko G.M. Metodologicheskie podhody k sovershenstvovaniyu strategicheskogo upravleniya sel’skim municipal’nym obrazovaniem [Methodological approaches to improvement of strategic management of rural municipality]. Fundamental’nye issledovaniya. 2015. no. 12-6. pp. 1194-1198. URL:https://elibrary.ru/ download/elibrary_25459004_47287270.pdf (date of access 20.03.2018).
8. Gricenko G.M. Problemy primeneniya slozhivshihsya metodov opredeleniya ehffektivnos i realizacii municipal’nyh program [Problems of application of the developed methods of determination of efficienc of implementation of municipal programs]. V sbornike: Prodovol’stvennaya bezopasnost’, importozameshchenie i social’no-ehkonomicheskie problemy razvitiya APK materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoprakticheskoj konferencii, 2016, no. 4, pp. 41-45.
9. Kovaleva E.B., Pytkina S.A., Ionova I.G. Ocenka ehffektivnosti upravleniya razvitiem infrastruktury sel’skih territorij regiona v sovremennyh usloviyah [Evaluation of efficienc of management of development of infrastructure of rural territories of the region in modern conditions]. V sbornike: Sovremennye problemy razvitiya ehkonomiki i upravleniya v regione materialy X Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii, 2016, pp. 382-385.
10. Kosenchuk O.V., Zinich A.V. Metodika ocenki mnogofunkcional’nogo razvitiya sel’skih territorij [Methods of estimation of multifunctional development of rural areas]. Ehkonomika sel’skogo hozyajstva Rossii, 2017, no. 11, pp. 84-89.
11. Kudinova M.G., Glotova N.I., Gerauf YU.V. Ocenka vliyaniya investicionnoj privlekatel’nosti sel’skih territorij Altajskogo kraya na razvitie i povyshenie sel’skohozyajstvennogo proizvodstva [Assessment of the impact of the investment attractiveness of rural areas of the Altai territory on the development and improvement of agricultural production]. V sbornike: Strategicheskie napravleniya razvitiya APK stran SNG materialy XVI Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii: v trekh tomah, 2017, pp. 100-104.
12. Lazareva V.V., Zinchenko M.V., Babij N.V., Vlasova N.YU. Ocenka ustojchivosti razvitiya prigranichnyh sel’skih territorij Amurskoj oblasti [Assessment of sustainable development of border rural areas of the Amur region]. Uspekhi sovremennoj nauki, 2017, vol. 3. no. 2, pp. 39-42.
13. Panova A.A., YArockaya E.V. Ocenka vliyaniya osnovnyh faktorov proizvodstva na ustojchivoe razvitie sel’skih territorij [Assessment of the impact of the main factors of production on the sustainable development of rural areas]. Novaya nauka: Teoreticheskij i prakticheskij vzglyad, 2016, vol. 81, no. 5. pp.285-288.
14. Rassadin V.V., Pavlov A.YU., Batova V.N., Vinnichek L.B. Formirovanie osnovnyh indikatorov ustojchivogo razvitiya sel’skih territorij s pozicij ehvolyucionno-geneticheskogo podhoda [Formation of the main indicators of sustainable development of rural areas from the perspective of evolutionary-genetic approach]. Niva Povolzh’ya, 2015. vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 139-145. URL:https://elibrary.ru/download/ elibrary_24999281_60518929.pdf (date of access 16.02.2018)
15. Sabetova T.V. Ocenka ehffektivnosti gosudarstvennoj podderzhki sel’skogo hozyajstva i ustojchivogo razvitiya sel’skih territorij [Evaluation of the effectiveness of state support for agriculture and sustainable development of rural areas]. Sovershenstvovanie ucheta, analiza i kontrolya kak mekhanizmov informacionnogo obespecheniya ustojchivogo razvitiya ehkonomiki, 2016, no. 2, pp. 280-286.
16. Stadnik A.T., CHernova S.G. Razrabotka indikatorov upravleniya gosudarstvenno-kooperativnymi formirovaniyami v APK regiona [Development of management indicators of statecooperative formations in the agro-industrial complex of the region]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta, 2017, vol. 42. no. 1, pp.241-245. URL:https:// elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_28944373_90492379.pdf (date of access 15.03.2018).
17. Truhachev A.V. Metodicheskie voprosy ocenki i rejtingovaniya territorij dlya razvitiya sel’skogo turizma [Methodological issues of evaluation and rating territories for the development of rural tourism]. Servis plus, 2016, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 30-37.
18. Truhachev V.I., Gromov E.I. Ocenka urovnya razvitiya sel’skih territorij v razreze regionov Rossii [Assessment of the level of development of rural areas in the context of Russian regions]. Ehkonomika sel’skogo hozyajstva Rossii, 2016, no. 4, pp. 57-65.
19. Hamavova A.A. Mnogokriterial’naya ocenka kak bazis sistemy upravleniya razvitiem sel’skih territorij [Multi-criteria evaluation as the basis of the system of management of development of rural territories]. Simvol nauki, 2016, vol. 14, no. 2-2, pp. 90-93.
20. SHumakova O.V., Kutuzova M.V. Monitoring urovnya social’no-ehkonomicheskogo razvitiya municipal’nyh rajonov sel’skoj mestnosti (na primere Omskoj oblasti) [Monitoring of the level of socio-economic development of municipal areas of rural areas (on the example of the Omsk region)]. Vestnik Orlovskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta, 2016, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 3-7.
21. YUrzina T.A. Modeli kompleksnogo razvitiya sel’skoj territorii: ih harakteristika i ocenka [Integrated rural development models: their characteristics and assessment]. Upravlenie ehkonomicheskimi sistemami: ehlektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal, 2017, vol. 103. no. 9, pp. 11.
Review
For citations:
Kosenchuk O.V., Zinich A.V. INDICATORS AND CRITERIA FOR ASSESSMENT OF MULTIFUNCTIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF RURAL TERRITORIES. The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal. 2018;15(2):321-329. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26518/2071-7296-2018-2-321-329
Views:
1003
Email this article 