Preview

The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal

Advanced search

Industrial dominance: the theory and the methods of diagnosis

Abstract

The results of industrial dominance’ theoretic research and the methods of diagnosis are presented. According to the authors, the impact of industrial dominance lies in the sphere of decreasing the firm’s access to agglomeration effects. The basic conditions which are needed for the emergence of industrial dominance are presented. The author presents the way to diagnose existence of industrial dominance along with the method of measuring the influence of industrial dominance within a particular industry. The results presented by the authors will help to form effective economic policy for industries where industrial dominance is presented.

About the Authors

M. V. Pyatkov
Omsk state university of F.M. Dostoyevsky
Russian Federation


G. D. Boush
Omsk humanitarian academy
Russian Federation


References

1. Тульчинcкий, Г.Л. От «спасения» и выживания к инновационному развитию: Социальное партнерство как основа решения проблемы моногородов / Г.Л. Тульчинский // Муниципальная власть. - 2011. - № 2. - С.36-40.

2. Chinitz B. Contrasts in agglomeration: New York and Pittsburgh / B. Chinitz // The American Economic Review. - 1961. - №51 (2), pp. 279-289.

3. Drucker J. Regional Industrial Dominance, Agglomeration Economies, and Manufacturing Plant Productivity / J. Drucker // US Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies. - 2007. - Paper № CES-07-31

4. Feser, E.J. Agglomeration, enterprise size, and productivity / E.J. Feser // Theories of Endogenous Regional Growth: Lessons for Regional Policies. - 2001. - pp. 231-251.

5. Rosenthal S.S., W.S. Strange Geography, industrial organization, and agglomeration / S.S. Rosental, W.S. Strange / S.S. Rosental // The Review of Economics and Statistics. 2003. no 85 (2). p. 377-393.

6. Holmes T.J. Localization of industry and vertical disintegration / T.J. Holmes // The Review of Economics and Statistics. - 1999. - №81 (2). - pp.314-325.

7. Hoover E. The location of economic activity [Электронный ресурс]. - New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1948. - 336 p. - url: https://archive.org/details/locationofeconom029874mbp

8. Sutton, J. Gibrat's legacy. Journal of Economic Literature. - 1997. - №35 (1). - pp. 40-59.

9. Lotti F. et al. Does Gibrat's Law hold among young, small firms? Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 2003. №13 (3). pp. 213-235.

10. Moomaw, R.L. Have changes in localization economies been responsible for declining productivity advantages in large cities? Journal of Regional Science. 1986. no 26 (1). pp. 193-200.


Review

For citations:


Pyatkov M.V., Boush G.D. Industrial dominance: the theory and the methods of diagnosis. The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal. 2016;(1(47)):137-143. (In Russ.)

Views: 527


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-7296 (Print)
ISSN 2658-5626 (Online)