Preview

The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal

Advanced search

Justification of the choice of a theoretical apparatus to describe the transport behavior of city residents (megapolis)

https://doi.org/10.26518/2071-7296-2021-18-6-746-758

Abstract

Introduction. The article presents an analysis of scientific papers on transport behavior, transport mobility of the population and patterns of behavior of passengers (individuals). The construction of mathematical models of transport behavior based on the theory of macrosystems has scientific novelty and prospects for study and implementation in practice. An urgent task on this path is to study the nature of collective behavior resulting from the interaction of multiple motives when making a decision about a trip. At the same time, in the flows of passengers and vehicles, it is assumed that there are spatio-temporal structures that reflect transport behavior at the macro level.
Description of the problem (overview). The transport behavior of the population is studied by both foreign and domestic scientists and specialists of the transport industry, however, the depth and study of the topic does not allow us to say that there are generalized schemes, models and mathematical descriptions of passenger behavior. Very little information is available about how exactly a passenger makes a decision whether he will make a train or not, i.e. behavioral models are practically not investigated. The main directions of research of transport behavior proposed by the authors of this work are as follows: creation of a theoretical apparatus for describing “transport behavior”; development of a mathematical model of the transport system of individual movements; construction of a transport behavior management system.
Materials and methods. The article uses a general systematic approach as the main research method. Passenger behavior patterns, as well as their reaction to changes occurring in the transport system, are described using the term “pattern”. Thus, the method of pattern analysis in nonlinear dynamics is additionally applied.
Results. The definition of the concept of “pattern” of transport behavior is given. From the standpoint of the theory of transport macrosystems, a pattern can be called a set of specific states that an element (an individual, a vehicle, etc.) “chooses” at various structural levels of a transport macrosystem from a subset of acceptable ones.
Discussion and conclusions. This paper proposes a new approach to the description of transport behavior from the standpoint of various scientific disciplines, the theory of macrosystems, which lays the basis for the creation of a theory of transport behavior, which is currently absent. As a result of the research , it was obtained: 1) the formulation of the system that most fully reflects the essence of “transport behavior” is a transport system of individual movements; 2) it is shown that the construction of such a system is best done within the framework of the theory of macrosystems; 3) such a concept as a “space-time diagram” of transport behavior is proposed, its connection with the traditional term of nonlinear dynamics, such as “pattern of behavior of a nonlinear system”, is established, 4) the development of the term “graph of transport behavior” is proposed in the direction of taking into account all phases of the transport process (pre-transport, transport, post-transport), which is reflected in the space-time diagram.

About the Authors

I. E. Agureev
Tula State University
Russian Federation

Igor E. Agureev, Dr. of Sci., Professor, Head of the Automobiles and Automobile Industry Department 

Tula



A. V. Akhromeshin
Tula State University
Russian Federation

Andrey V. Akhromeshin, Cand. of Sci., Associate Professor of the Automobiles and Automobile Industry Department

Tula



References

1. Agureev I.E., Ahromeshin A.V. Podhody k formalizacii ponyatiya transportnogo povedeniya naseleniya gorodskih aglomeracij [Approaches to formalization of the concept of transport behavior of the population of urban agglomerations] // Intellekt. Innovacii. Investicii. 2021. 2: 60–70. DOI: 10.25198/2077-7175-2021-2-60. (in Russian)

2. Shvecov V.I. Problemy modelirovaniya peredvizhenij v transportnyh setyah [Problems of modeling movements in transport networks ]TRUDY MFTI. 2010.2(4): 169-179. (in Russian)

3. Shvecov V.I. Modelirovanie transportnyh potokov v krupnom gorode s primeneniem k moskovskoj aglomeracii [Modeling of traffic flows in a large city with application to the Moscow agglomeration] // Avtomatika i telemekhanika. 2005. № 11. S. 113-125.

4. Carrothers G.A.P. An historical review of the gravity and potential concepts of human interaction // J. American Instit. Planners. 1956. V. 22. P. 94-102.

5. Wilson, A.G. A statistical theory of spatial distribution models. Transportation Research, 1967, Vol. 1, Iss. 3, ss . 253-269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-1647(67)90035-4.

6. Wilson, A.G. Complex Spatial Systems. The Modelling Foundations of Urban and Regional Analysis. 1st ed., London, 2000, 184 r. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315838045.

7. Wilson, A.G. The «Thermodynamics» of City: Evolution and Complexity Science in Urban Modelling. Complexity and Spatial Networks, Advances in Spatial Science. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidlberg, 2009: 11-31. [Elektronnyj resurs]: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-01554-0_2. Dostup 21.02.2020.

8. Fedorov V.A. Transportnoe povedenie individuumov – osnovnoj istochnik gorodskih transportnyh problem [The transport behavior of individuals is the main source of urban transport problems] // Molodoj uchenyj. 2015.18 (98): 309–316. (in Russian)

9. Slozhnye samorazvivayushchiesya transportnye sistemy [Complex self-developing transport systems] Korchagin V.A., Novikov A.N., Lyapin S.A., Rizaeva Yu.N.// Mir transporta i tekhnologicheskih mashin 2016 2 (53): 110-116. (in Russian)

10. Korchagin, V.A. Noosferologisticheskie podhody sozdaniya socioprirodoekonomicheskih transportno-logisticheskih sistem [Noospherological approaches to the creation of socio-socio-economic transport and logistics systems // Avtotransportnoe predpriyatie. 2012: 1. (in Russian)

11. Urban sustainable mobility. Part 2: Simulation models and impacts estimation March 2015. Transport Problems 10(1):5-16 DOI:10.21307/tp-2015-001. https://www.exeley.com/exeley/journals/transport_problems/10/1/pdf/10.21307_tp-2015-001.pdf.

12. R.A.M. Madhuwanthi, Ashu Marasinghe, R.P.C. Janaka Rajapakse, Asanka D. Dharmawansa, Shusaku Nomura, Factors Influencing to Travel Behavior on Transport Mode Choice, International Journal of Affective Engineering 15(2), December 2015, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5057/ijae.IJAE-D-15-00044.

13. Quan Liang, Jiancheng Weng, Wei Zhou, Selene Baez Santamaria, Jianming Ma, Jian Rong (2018) Individual Travel Behavior Modeling of Public Transport Passenger Based on Graph Construction. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3859830 / (accessed 09.09.2020).

14. Thomas W.I. The behavior pattern and situation // Publications of the American sociological society. – Chicago, 1928. 22: 1-13. elibrary_15340895_58711678.

15. Suhoparov M.E., Semenov V.V., Lebedev I.S., Garanin A.V. Podhod k analizu sostoyaniya uzlov «industrii 4.0» na osnove povedencheskih patternov [An approach to analyzing the state of Industry 4.0 nodes based on behavioral patterns] // Naukoemkie tekhnologii v kosmicheskih issledovaniyah Zemli. 2020. 12(5): 83–91. doi: 10.36724/2409-5419-2020-12-5-83- 91.

16. Bashkirtseva I., Ryashko L., Slepukhina E. Stochastic generation and deformation of toroidal oscillations in neuron model, International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 2018, 2(6): 1850070. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127418500700.

17. Ryashko L. Sensitivity analysis of the noise-induced oscillatory multistability in Higgins model of glycolysis, Chaos, 2018, 28(3): 033602. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4989982.

18. Bashkirtseva I., Ryashko L. Stochastic sensitivity and method of principal directions in excitability analysis of the Hodgkin-Huxley model, International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 2019, 29 (13): 1950186. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127419501864.

19. Savel’eva E.O., Lorens P. Sravnitel’nyj analiz modelej gorodskoj mobil’nosti v Rossii i za rubezhom [Comparative analysis of urban mobility models in Russia and abroad] // Vestnik Permskogo nacional’nogo issledovatel’skogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Prikladnaya ekologiya. Urbanistika. 2019. 3: 79–94. DOI: 10.15593/2409-5125/2019.03.06. (in Russian)

20. Strategii ustojchivoj mobil’nosti: luchshie mirovye praktiki [Sustainable mobility strategies: world’s best practices ] /V Komarov, V Akimova // Ekonomicheskaya politika. 2021. 16(1): 82–103 DOI: 10.18288/1994-5124-2021-1-82-103. (in Russian)

21. Krushel’ E.G., Ogar T.P., Panfilov A.E., Stepanchenko I.V., Stepanchenko O.V. Ocenka prigodnosti modeli peremeshcheniya passazhirov mezhdu ostanovkami gorodskogo passazhirskogo obshchestvennogo transporta dlya vyyavleniya skrytyh zakonomernostej povedeniya passazhiropotoka [Assessment of the suitability of the model of passenger movement between stops of urban passenger public transport to identify hidden patterns of passenger traffic behavior] // Inzhenernyj vestnik Dona, 2021. 4 –2021ivdon.ru/ru/magazine/archive/n4y2021/6936. (in Russian)


Review

For citations:


Agureev I.E., Akhromeshin A.V. Justification of the choice of a theoretical apparatus to describe the transport behavior of city residents (megapolis). The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal. 2021;18(6):746-758. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26518/2071-7296-2021-18-6-746-758

Views: 492


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-7296 (Print)
ISSN 2658-5626 (Online)