ANALYSIS OF INTERACTION OF A CANTILEVER KNIFE BLADE WITH SOIL
https://doi.org/10.26518/2071-7296-2020-17-2-172-181
- Р Р‡.МессенРТвЂВВВВВВВВжер
- РћРТвЂВВВВВВВВнокласснРСвЂВВВВВВВВРєРСвЂВВВВВВВВ
- LiveJournal
- Telegram
- ВКонтакте
- РЎРєРѕРїРСвЂВВВВВВВВровать ссылку
Full Text:
Abstract
Introduction. In order to the road to be durable at the minimum necessary cost for its construction, the topsoil should be carefully removed without disturbing the soil located under the topsoil. The problem of cheapening the roads construction without reducing their quality can be solved by creating a continuous unit for the formation of the underlying layer. The main working elemens of the unit are shovels. The blade of the cantilever knife fixed on the shovel cuts the topsoil from the bottom. It is located at the angle of 45 ° to the direction of movement of the shovel and also has a sharpening angle. The front angle of the blade of the cantilever knife.
The method of research. The cantilever knife is divided into the elements: the edge of the blade, the upper face of the blade, the surface of the cantilever knife, a lower plane. The consecutive impact of many cantilever knives on the ground within the operating unit width with the ground of one notional cantilever knife at a distance necessary for the excavation of one cubic meter of soil was replaced. The interacting forces of a notional cantilever knife with soil are called notional forces. The methodology of calculating energy costs when penetrating the edge of the blade of the cantilever knife into the soil is presented: to separate a layer from the body of the soil, to create a gap in the body of the soil, to overcome the friction of the soil against the edge of a blade of a cantilever knife. The total energy consumption during the interaction of a edge of a blade of a cantilever knife in the soil excavation with a volume of one cubic meter was obtained by adding the particular energy consumption.
Results. Based on the developed calculation method, the distance at which a cantilever knife has to move to excavate one cubic meter of soil, and the time of this movement determined. The energy costs are calculated when penetrating the edge of the blade of the cantilever knife into the soil: to separate a layer from the body of soil, to create a gap in the body of soil, to overcome the friction of the soil against the edge of a blade of a cantilever knife. The total energy consumption and their structure during the interaction of the edge of a blade of a cantilever knife with the soil during the soil excavation with a volume of one cubic meter are determined.
Conclusion. The total energy consumption during the interaction of an edge of a blade of a cantilever knife with the soil during the development of soil with a volume of one cubic meter is about 7 thousand J/cubic meter. In the energy costs structure during the interaction of an edge of a blade of a cantilever knife with the soil, energy costs prevail to overcome the friction of the soil against an edge of a blade. To determine the total energy consumption for cutting soil with cantilever knives shovels of the unit for removing the upper soil layer from the underlying layer of a road, it is necessary to analyze the interaction of other elements of cantilever knives with the soil.
Financial transparency: the authors have no financial interest in the presented materials or methods. There is no conflict of interest.
About the Author
V. A. NikolaevRussian Federation
Vladimir A. Nikolaev – Dr. of Sci. (Engineering), Professor of the Construction and Road Machines’ Department
Yaroslavl, 88, Moskovskii prospekt
References
1. Nikolaev V.A. Soil layer cut off by the aggregate for removing the topsoil from the road sublayer: determination of the chain speed and sizes. The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal. 2020;17(1):32-43. https://doi.org/10.26518/2071-7296-2020-17-1-32-43 (In Russ.).
2. Karasjov G.N. Opredelenie sily rezanija grunta s uchjotom uprugih deformacij pri razrushenii [Determining of the cutting force of soil considering elastic deformation at fracture]. Stroitel’nye i dorozhnye mashiny. 2008; 4: 36-42 (in Russian).
3. Karnauhov A.I., Orlovskij S.N. Opredelenie zatrat udel’noj jenergii na process rezanija lesnyh pochv torcevymi frezami [Determining specific energy costs on the cutting process of forest soils with end mills]. Stroitel’nye i dorozhnye mashiny. 2010; 1: 20-22 (in Russian).
4. Kravec I.M. Opredelenie kriticheskoj glubiny rezanija pri kombinirovannom rezanii gruntov gidrofrezoj [Determining critical cutting depth when combined cutting soils with a hydromiller]. Stroitel’nye i dorozhnye mashiny. 2010; 5: 47-49 (in Russian).
5. Kirillov F.F. Determinirovannaja matematicheskaja model’ vremennogo raspredelenija tjagovogo usilija dlja mnogorezcovyh rabochih organov zemlerojnyh mashin [A deterministic mathematical model of the temporal distribution of traction for multicuttingh working elements of earth-moving machines]. Stroitel’nye i dorozhnye mashiny. 2010; 11: 44-48 (in Russian).
6. Berestov E.I. Vlijanie trenija grunta po poverhnosti nozha na soprotivlenie rezaniju [Influence of friction of soil on the surface of the knife cutting resistance]. Stroitel’nye i dorozhnye mashiny. 2010; 11: 34-38 (in Russian).
7. Vershinin A.V., Zubov V.S., Tjul’nev A.M. Povyshenie jeffektivnosti diskofrezernyh rabochih mehanizmov dlja razrabotki mjorzlyh gruntov [Efficiency improvement of the disk milling working mechanisms for the development of frozen soil]. Stroitel’nye i dorozhnye mashiny. 2012; 8: 42-44 (in Russian).
8. Balovnev V.I., Nguen Z.Sh. Opredelenie soprotivlenij pri razrabotke gruntov ryhlitelem po integral’nomu pokazatelju prochnosti [Determining of resistances when excavating soils with a ripper according to a combined indicator of strength]. Stroitel’nye i dorozhnye mashiny. 2005; 3: 38-40 (in Russian).
9. Ryabets N., Kurzhner F. Weakening of frozen soils by means of ultra-high frequency energy. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 2003; 36: 115-128.
10. Liu X., Liu P. Experimental research on the compressive fracture toughness of wing fracture of frozen soil. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 2011; 65: 421-428.
11. Talalay P.G. Subglacial till and Bedrock drilling. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 2013; 86: 142- 166.
12. Sun X. ACT-timely experimental study on meso-scopic damage development of frozen soil under triaxial shearing. Rock and Soil Mechanics. 2005; 8: 150-163.
13. Li Q. Development of Frozen Soil Model. Advances in Earth Science. 2006; 12: 96-103.
14. Atkinson J. The Mechanics of Soils and Foundations. CRC. Press. 2007: 448.
15. Balovnev V.I., Danilov R.G., Ulitich O.Ju. Issledovanie upravljaemyh nozhevyh sistem zemlerojno-transportnyh mashin [The study of controlled knife systems of ground-moving machines]. Stroitel’nye i dorozhnye mashiny. 2017; 2: 12-15 (in Russian).
16. Nilov V.A., Fjodorov E.V. Razrabotka grunta skreperom v uslovijah svobodnogo rezanija [Soil excavation with a scraper in free cutting conditions]. Stroitel’nye i dorozhnye mashiny. 2016; 2: 7-10 (in Russian).
17. Chmil’ V.P. Nasosno-akkumuljativnyj privod ryhlitelja s avtomaticheskim vyborom ugla rezanija [Pump-accumulating ripper drive with automatic cutting angle selection]. Stroitel’nye i dorozhnye mashiny. 2016; 11: 18-20 (in Russian).
18. Kabashev R.A., Turgumbaev S.D. Jeksperimental’nye issledovanija processa kopanija gruntov rotorno-diskovymi rabochimi organami pod gidrostaticheskim davleniem [Experimental studies of the process of digging soils by rotary-disk working elements under hydrostatic pressure]. Vestnik SibADI. 2016; 4: 23-28 (in Russian).
19. Sjomkin D.S. O vlijanii skorosti rabochego organa na silu soprotivlenija rezaniju grunta [About the impact of the speed of the working element on the resistance strength of ground cutting]. Vestnik SibADI. 2017; 1: 37-43 (in Russian).
20. Konstantinov Ju.V. Metodika raschjota soprotivlenija i momenta soprotivlenija rezaniju pochvy prjamym plastinchatym nozhom frezy [The method of calculating resistance and the moment of resistance to soil cutting with a straight plate cutter knife]. Traktory i sel’hozmashiny. 2019; 5: 31-39 (in Russian).
21. Syromjatnikov Ju.N., Hramov I.S., Vojnash S.A. Gibkij jelement v sostave rabochih organov rotornoj pochvoobrabatyvajushhej ryhlitel’no-separirujushhej mashiny [Flexible element in the working elements of the rotary soil processing rippering and separating machine]. Traktory i sel’hozmashiny. 2018; 5: 32-39 (in Russian).
22. Parhomenko G.G., Parhomenko S.G. Silovoj analiz mehanizmov peremeshhenija rabochih organov pochvoobrabatyvajushhih mashin po zadannoj traektorii [Power analysis of the mechanisms of movement of working elements of soil processing machines on a predicted trajectory]. Traktory i sel’hozmashiny. 2018; 1: 47-54 (in Russian).
23. Dranjaev S.B., Chatkin M.N., Korjavin S.M. Modelirovanie raboty vintovogo G-obraznogo nozha pochvoobrabatyvajushhej frezy [Simulation of the work of a helical G-shaped knife soil cutter]. Traktory i sel’hozmashiny. 2017; 7: 13-19 (in Russian).
24. Nikolayev V.A. Mashiny dlya obrabotki pochvy. Teoriya i raschot [Soil processing machines. Theory and calculation]. Yaroslav, Izd. FGBOU VO YAGSKHA, 2014. 358 p. (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Nikolaev V.A. ANALYSIS OF INTERACTION OF A CANTILEVER KNIFE BLADE WITH SOIL. The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal. 2020;17(2):172-181. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26518/2071-7296-2020-17-2-172-181
ISSN 2658-5626 (Online)